Energy > Kerosene Stats: compare key data on Japan & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Japan	Latvia	HISTORY
Consumption by households	10.41 million ton Ranked 1st. 3470 times more than Latvia	3,000 ton Ranked 101st.
Consumption by households > Per capita	81.47 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 69 times more than Latvia	1.18 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 96th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	19.92 million ton Ranked 1st. 9962 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 140th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	155.93 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 186 times more than Latvia	0.837 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 125th.
Consumption by industry and construction	2.21 million ton Ranked 1st. 2210 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 55th.
Consumption by other consumers	9.03 million ton Ranked 1st. 4514 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 55th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	70.66 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 84 times more than Latvia	0.837 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	15.36 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 36 times more than Latvia	0.422 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th.
Consumption for non-energy uses	744,000 ton Ranked 1st. 744 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 6th.
Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	5.82 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 15 times more than Latvia	0.387 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd.
Consumption for non-energy uses per million	5,822.83 ton Ranked 1st. 15 times more than Latvia	390.12 ton Ranked 1st.
Gross inland availability per 1000	179.65 ton Ranked 4th. 207 times more than Latvia	0.869 ton Ranked 129th.
Imports	914,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 457 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 100th.
Transfers out	245,000 ton Ranked 4th. 123 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 11th.
Transfers out per 1000	1.92 ton Ranked 6th. 2 times more than Latvia	0.869 ton Ranked 7th.
Exports	313,000 ton Ranked 10th. 78 times more than Latvia	4,000 ton Ranked 40th.
Consumption in agriculture	486,000 ton Ranked 1st. 486 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 19th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	15.36 ton Ranked 2nd. 36 times more than Latvia	0.421 ton Ranked 36th.
Imports per 1000	7.15 ton Ranked 44th. 8 times more than Latvia	0.869 ton Ranked 91st.
Exports per 1000	2.45 ton Ranked 20th. 54% more than Latvia	1.59 ton Ranked 22nd.
Net transfers per 1000	1.92 ton Ranked 6th. 2 times more than Latvia	0.869 ton Ranked 7th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	173.23 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 410 times more than Latvia	0.422 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 142nd.
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	3.8 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 9 times more than Latvia	0.401 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th.
Energy balance requirement	164,000 ton Ranked 15th. 82 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 102nd.
Imports > Per capita	7.15 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 51st. 8 times more than Latvia	0.869 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 99th.
Net transfers	245,000 ton Ranked 4th. 123 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 11th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	17.3 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 41 times more than Latvia	0.422 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 41st.
Consumption by other industries and construction	1.96 million ton Ranked 1st. 1963 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 54th.
Exports > Per capita	2.45 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st. 56% more than Latvia	1.57 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	179.65 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 207 times more than Latvia	0.869 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 140th.
Gross inland availability	22.95 million ton Ranked 1st. 11477 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 151st.
Energy balance requirement per million	1,283.53 ton Ranked 81st. 48% more than Latvia	869.37 ton Ranked 85th.
Net inland availability per 1000	173.23 ton Ranked 5th. 411 times more than Latvia	0.421 ton Ranked 141st.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	17.3 ton Ranked 3rd. 41 times more than Latvia	0.421 ton Ranked 40th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	70.66 ton Ranked 2nd. 84 times more than Latvia	0.837 ton Ranked 38th.
Net transfers > Per capita	1.92 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th. 2 times more than Latvia	0.869 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-2,856,606,195,313.6 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 47th.	2.95 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 14th.
Transfers out > Per capita	1.92 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th. 2 times more than Latvia	0.869 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	1,283.52 ton per million people Ranked 89th. 48% more than Latvia	869.38 ton per million people Ranked 93th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	3,420.1 ton per million people Ranked 4th.	-773.394 ton per million people Ranked 37th.
Net inland availability	22.13 million ton Ranked 1st. 22134 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 157th.
Consumption by households per 1000	81.47 ton Ranked 5th. 68 times more than Latvia	1.19 ton Ranked 95th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	155.93 ton Ranked 5th. 186 times more than Latvia	0.837 ton Ranked 123th.
Consumption in agriculture per 1000	3.8 ton Ranked 2nd. 9 times more than Latvia	0.407 ton Ranked 11th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation