Energy > Kerosene Stats: compare key data on Mexico & Poland

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Mexico	Poland	HISTORY
Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	0.159 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st.	-0.051 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.
Consumption by energy sector	1,000 ton Ranked 4th. The same as Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 9th.
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.01 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th.	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 3 times more than Mexico
Consumption by households and other consumers	235,000 ton Ranked 23th. 39 times more than Poland	6,000 ton Ranked 119th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	2.28 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 109th. 15 times more than Poland	0.157 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 154th.
Consumption by industry and construction	19,000 ton Ranked 20th. 19 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 52nd.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.184 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 44th. 7 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 57th.
Consumption by petroleum refineries	1,000 ton Ranked 3rd. The same as Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 7th.
Consumption by transportation industry	7,000 ton Ranked 5th. 4 times more than Poland	2,000 ton Ranked 10th.
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	0.069 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th. 33% more than Poland	0.052 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th.
Consumption for non-energy uses	5,000 ton Ranked 4th.	12,000 ton Ranked 4th. 2 times more than Mexico
Gross inland availability per 1000	2.96 ton Ranked 107th. 113 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 158th.
Imports	55,000 ton Ranked 38th. 4 times more than Poland	15,000 ton Ranked 58th.
Production from refineries	330,000 ton Ranked 25th. 19 times more than Poland	17,000 ton Ranked 71st.
Production from refineries > Per capita	3.2 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 51st. 7 times more than Poland	0.445 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 80th.
Transfers out	39,000 ton Ranked 7th. 39 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 7th.
Consumption for non-energy uses per million	56.89 ton Ranked 3rd.	312 ton Ranked 4th. 5 times more than Mexico
Consumption by transportation industry per 1000	0.064 ton Ranked 9th. 24% more than Poland	0.0518 ton Ranked 10th.
Transfers out per 1000	0.352 ton Ranked 9th. 14 times more than Poland	0.0259 ton Ranked 7th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	0.172 ton Ranked 45th. 7 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 56th.
Imports per 1000	0.556 ton Ranked 102nd. 42% more than Poland	0.392 ton Ranked 99th.
Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	0.00963 ton Ranked 3rd.	0.0259 ton Ranked 6th. 3 times more than Mexico
Net transfers per 1000	0.352 ton Ranked 9th. 14 times more than Poland	0.0259 ton Ranked 7th.
Net transfers > Per capita	0.378 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 15 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	339.51 billion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 20th.	-26,201,708,613.418 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 30th.
Total > Production	330,000 ton Ranked 25th. 19 times more than Poland	17,000 ton Ranked 71st.
Transfers out > Per capita	0.378 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 15 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th.
Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	2.44 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 94 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th.
Energy balance requirement	-2,000 ton Ranked 123th.	-17,000 ton Ranked 129th. 9 times more than Mexico
Imports > Per capita	0.586 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 100th. 49% more than Poland	0.392 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 97th.
Net transfers	39,000 ton Ranked 7th. 39 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 7th.
Changes in stocks at producers	14,000 ton Ranked 12th.	-2,000 ton Ranked 29th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	0.184 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 48th. 7 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 58th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	19,000 ton Ranked 19th. 19 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 49th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	3.18 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 115th. 122 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 169th.
Gross inland availability	328,000 ton Ranked 22nd. 328 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 158th.
Energy balance requirement per million	-18.062 ton Ranked 113th.	-445.429 ton Ranked 117th. 25 times more than Mexico
Total > Production per 1000	2.98 ton Ranked 49th. 7 times more than Poland	0.445 ton Ranked 76th.
Net inland availability per 1000	2.29 ton Ranked 108th. 88 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 152nd.
Consumption by energy sector per million	9.63 ton Ranked 4th.	25.89 ton Ranked 8th. 3 times more than Mexico
Production from refineries per 1000	2.98 ton Ranked 49th. 7 times more than Poland	0.445 ton Ranked 76th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	0.172 ton Ranked 48th. 7 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 57th.
Changes in stocks at producers per 1000	0.153 ton Ranked 21st.	-0.0525 ton Ranked 25th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	2.46 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 115th. 95 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 162nd.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	-19.4 ton per million people Ranked 121st.	-445.428 ton per million people Ranked 125th. 23 times more than Mexico
Changes in stocks > Per capita	19.4 ton per million people Ranked 17th.	-52.379 ton per million people Ranked 22nd.
Net inland availability	254,000 ton Ranked 24th. 254 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 152nd.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	2.12 ton Ranked 102nd. 14 times more than Poland	0.157 ton Ranked 144th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation