Energy > Kerosene Stats: compare key data on Norway & Poland

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Norway	Poland	HISTORY
Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	2.55 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th.	-0.051 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.
Consumption by chemical industry	1,000 ton Ranked 12th. The same as Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 9th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.226 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 9 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	105,000 ton Ranked 38th. 18 times more than Poland	6,000 ton Ranked 119th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	22.71 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 29th. 145 times more than Poland	0.157 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 154th.
Consumption by industry and construction	5,000 ton Ranked 38th. 5 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 52nd.
Consumption by other consumers	5,000 ton Ranked 38th.	6,000 ton Ranked 37th. 20% more than Norway
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	1.08 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th. 7 times more than Poland	0.157 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 53th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	1.12 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 43 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 57th.
Consumption for non-energy uses	1,000 ton Ranked 5th.	12,000 ton Ranked 4th. 12 times more than Norway
Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	0.224 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd.	0.312 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 39% more than Norway
Gross inland availability per 1000	27.25 ton Ranked 26th. 1041 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 158th.
Imports	1,000 ton Ranked 121st.	15,000 ton Ranked 58th. 15 times more than Norway
Production from refineries	143,000 ton Ranked 38th. 8 times more than Poland	17,000 ton Ranked 71st.
Production from refineries > Per capita	30.93 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 70 times more than Poland	0.445 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 80th.
Consumption for non-energy uses per million	224.12 ton Ranked 3rd.	312 ton Ranked 4th. 39% more than Norway
Exports	28,000 ton Ranked 22nd. 65% more than Poland	17,000 ton Ranked 24th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	1.12 ton Ranked 20th. 43 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 56th.
Changes in stocks at producers per 1000	2.55 ton Ranked 6th.	-0.0525 ton Ranked 25th.
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.226 ton Ranked 7th. 9 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 10th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	4.54 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 7th.	-26,201,708,613.418 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 30th.
Total > Production	143,000 ton Ranked 38th. 8 times more than Poland	17,000 ton Ranked 71st.
Energy balance requirement	-17,000 ton Ranked 130th. The same as Poland	-17,000 ton Ranked 129th.
Imports > Per capita	0.216 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 113th.	0.392 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 97th. 81% more than Norway
Energy balance requirement per million	-3,677.034 ton Ranked 125th. 8 times more than Poland	-445.429 ton Ranked 117th.
Total > Production per 1000	30.93 ton Ranked 18th. 69 times more than Poland	0.445 ton Ranked 76th.
Net inland availability per 1000	22.71 ton Ranked 22nd. 867 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 152nd.
Production from refineries per 1000	30.93 ton Ranked 18th. 69 times more than Poland	0.445 ton Ranked 76th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	1.12 ton Ranked 20th. 43 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 57th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	1.08 ton Ranked 32nd. 7 times more than Poland	0.157 ton Ranked 50th.
Imports per 1000	0.216 ton Ranked 105th.	0.392 ton Ranked 99th. 81% more than Norway
Exports per 1000	6.06 ton Ranked 15th. 14 times more than Poland	0.445 ton Ranked 31st.
Net inland availability > Per capita	22.71 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th. 874 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 162nd.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	-3,677.026 ton per million people Ranked 133th. 8 times more than Poland	-445.428 ton per million people Ranked 125th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-2,162.956 ton per million people Ranked 44th. 41 times more than Poland	-52.379 ton per million people Ranked 22nd.
Net inland availability	105,000 ton Ranked 40th. 105 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 152nd.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	22.71 ton Ranked 21st. 145 times more than Poland	0.157 ton Ranked 144th.
Changes in stocks at producers	11,000 ton Ranked 14th.	-2,000 ton Ranked 29th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	1.12 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 43 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 58th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	5,000 ton Ranked 36th. 5 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 49th.
Exports > Per capita	6.06 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th. 14 times more than Poland	0.445 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 32nd.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	27.25 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th. 1048 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 169th.
Gross inland availability	126,000 ton Ranked 38th. 126 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 158th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation