Energy > Kerosene Stats: compare key data on Netherlands & Poland

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Netherlands	Poland	HISTORY
Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	-3.271 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th. 64 times more than Poland	-0.051 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.
Consumption by chemical industry	5,000 ton Ranked 4th. 5 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 9th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.306 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 12 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	55,000 ton Ranked 53th. 9 times more than Poland	6,000 ton Ranked 119th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	3.37 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 94th. 21 times more than Poland	0.157 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 154th.
Consumption by industry and construction	5,000 ton Ranked 38th. 5 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 52nd.
Consumption by other consumers	40,000 ton Ranked 15th. 7 times more than Poland	6,000 ton Ranked 37th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	2.45 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 17th. 16 times more than Poland	0.157 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 53th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.123 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 46th. 5 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 57th.
Consumption for non-energy uses	3,000 ton Ranked 6th.	12,000 ton Ranked 4th. 4 times more than Netherlands
Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	0.184 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th.	0.312 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 70% more than Netherlands
Gross inland availability per 1000	45.16 ton Ranked 17th. 1724 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 158th.
Imports	507,000 ton Ranked 5th. 34 times more than Poland	15,000 ton Ranked 58th.
Production from refineries	469,000 ton Ranked 21st. 28 times more than Poland	17,000 ton Ranked 71st.
Production from refineries > Per capita	28.74 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st. 65 times more than Poland	0.445 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 80th.
Transfers out	674,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 674 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 7th.
Consumption for non-energy uses per million	183.83 ton Ranked 4th.	312 ton Ranked 4th. 70% more than Netherlands
Transfers out per 1000	41.3 ton Ranked 2nd. 1597 times more than Poland	0.0259 ton Ranked 7th.
Exports	256,000 ton Ranked 12th. 15 times more than Poland	17,000 ton Ranked 24th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	0.123 ton Ranked 45th. 5 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 56th.
Imports per 1000	31.07 ton Ranked 15th. 79 times more than Poland	0.392 ton Ranked 99th.
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.306 ton Ranked 3rd. 12 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 10th.
Exports per 1000	15.69 ton Ranked 12th. 35 times more than Poland	0.445 ton Ranked 31st.
Net transfers per 1000	41.3 ton Ranked 2nd. 1597 times more than Poland	0.0259 ton Ranked 7th.
Net transfers > Per capita	41.3 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 1588 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-2,009,364,896,269.68 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 51st. 77 times more than Poland	-26,201,708,613.418 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 30th.
Total > Production	469,000 ton Ranked 21st. 28 times more than Poland	17,000 ton Ranked 71st.
Transfers out > Per capita	41.3 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 1588 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th.
Energy balance requirement	268,000 ton Ranked 11th.	-17,000 ton Ranked 129th.
Imports > Per capita	31.07 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st. 79 times more than Poland	0.392 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 97th.
Net transfers	674,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 674 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 7th.
Net inland availability	60,000 ton Ranked 54th. 60 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 152nd.
Changes in stocks at producers	-50,000 ton Ranked 36th. 25 times more than Poland	-2,000 ton Ranked 29th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	0.306 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 40th. 12 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 58th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	2,000 ton Ranked 45th. Twice as much as Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 49th.
Exports > Per capita	15.69 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 35 times more than Poland	0.445 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 32nd.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	45.16 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th. 1737 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 169th.
Gross inland availability	737,000 ton Ranked 14th. 737 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 158th.
Energy balance requirement per million	16,421.7 ton Ranked 21st.	-445.429 ton Ranked 117th.
Total > Production per 1000	28.74 ton Ranked 19th. 65 times more than Poland	0.445 ton Ranked 76th.
Net inland availability per 1000	3.68 ton Ranked 89th. 140 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 152nd.
Production from refineries per 1000	28.74 ton Ranked 19th. 65 times more than Poland	0.445 ton Ranked 76th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	0.306 ton Ranked 40th. 12 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 57th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	2.45 ton Ranked 15th. 16 times more than Poland	0.157 ton Ranked 50th.
Changes in stocks at producers per 1000	-3.27 ton Ranked 39th. 62 times more than Poland	-0.0525 ton Ranked 25th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	3.68 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 99th. 141 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 162nd.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	16,421.72 ton per million people Ranked 29th.	-445.428 ton per million people Ranked 125th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-1,041.675 ton per million people Ranked 37th. 20 times more than Poland	-52.379 ton per million people Ranked 22nd.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	3.37 ton Ranked 86th. 21 times more than Poland	0.157 ton Ranked 144th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation