Energy > Residual fuel oil Stats: compare key data on New Zealand & Sweden

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	New Zealand	Sweden	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	-21,000 ton Ranked 54th.	193,000 ton Ranked 4th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-5.123 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 68th.	21.39 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	20,000 ton Ranked 57th.	43,000 ton Ranked 42nd. 2 times more than New Zealand
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	4.88 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th. 2% more than Sweden	4.76 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.
Consumption by industry and construction	4,000 ton Ranked 122nd.	919,000 ton Ranked 28th. 230 times more than New Zealand
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	0.976 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 118th.	101.84 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 104 times more than New Zealand
Consumption by other industries and construction	4,000 ton Ranked 122nd.	753,000 ton Ranked 29th. 188 times more than New Zealand
Consumption in agriculture	31,000 ton Ranked 21st. 3 times more than Sweden	12,000 ton Ranked 26th.
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	7.73 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th. 6 times more than Sweden	1.33 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st.
Conversion in thermal power plants	1,000 ton Ranked 119th.	281,000 ton Ranked 69th. 281 times more than New Zealand
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	0.264 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 110th.	31.14 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 71st. 118 times more than New Zealand
Conversion to other forms of energy	1,000 ton Ranked 121st.	350,000 ton Ranked 61st. 350 times more than New Zealand
Imports	3,000 ton Ranked 136th.	539,000 ton Ranked 45th. 180 times more than New Zealand
Imports > Per capita	0.748 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 133th.	59.73 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 51st. 80 times more than New Zealand
Net transfers	-5,000 ton Ranked 11th.	-36,000 ton Ranked 15th. 7 times more than New Zealand
Net transfers > Per capita	-1.296 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th.	-3.989 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th. 3 times more than New Zealand
Net inland availability > Per capita	22.2 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 75th.	114.8 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 23th. 5 times more than New Zealand
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	16.35 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. Twice as much as Sweden	8.2 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th.
Changes in stocks at producers	10,000 ton Ranked 24th.	-4,000 ton Ranked 34th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	4.84 ton Ranked 31st. 2% more than Sweden	4.76 ton Ranked 34th.
Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	2.8 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 14th.	-0.459 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th.
Consumption by transportation industry	67,000 ton Ranked 25th.	74,000 ton Ranked 23th. 10% more than New Zealand
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	0.264 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 112th.	38.78 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 66th. 147 times more than New Zealand
Bunkers	214,000 ton Ranked 40th.	1.84 million ton Ranked 16th. 9 times more than New Zealand
Consumption by other consumers	20,000 ton Ranked 43th.	24,000 ton Ranked 39th. 20% more than New Zealand
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	4.88 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th. 83% more than Sweden	2.66 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.
Bunkers per 1000	51.77 ton Ranked 24th.	204 ton Ranked 10th. 4 times more than New Zealand
Changes in stocks at producers per 1000	2.8 ton Ranked 13th.	-0.459 ton Ranked 32nd.
Changes in stocks per million	-5,079.949 ton Ranked 69th.	21,374.21 ton Ranked 6th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	0.968 ton Ranked 113th.	83.39 ton Ranked 13th. 86 times more than New Zealand
Imports per 1000	0.745 ton Ranked 124th.	59.69 ton Ranked 43th. 80 times more than New Zealand
Net transfers per 1000	-1.296 ton Ranked 10th.	-3.987 ton Ranked 17th. 3 times more than New Zealand
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	0.264 ton Ranked 110th.	31.12 ton Ranked 65th. 118 times more than New Zealand
Net inland availability per 1000	22.01 ton Ranked 69th.	114.73 ton Ranked 18th. 5 times more than New Zealand
Transfers in per million	-1,296.109 ton Ranked 1st.	-3,986.9 ton Ranked 8th. 3 times more than New Zealand
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	0.968 ton Ranked 113th.	101.78 ton Ranked 11th. 105 times more than New Zealand
Consumption in agriculture per 1000	7.7 ton Ranked 6th. 6 times more than Sweden	1.33 ton Ranked 21st.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	0.264 ton Ranked 112th.	38.76 ton Ranked 61st. 147 times more than New Zealand
Transfers in	-5,000 ton Ranked 1st.	-36,000 ton Ranked 5th. 7 times more than New Zealand
Bunkers > Per capita	52.21 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th.	204.12 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 4 times more than New Zealand
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.976 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 118th.	83.44 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th. 85 times more than New Zealand
Net inland availability	91,000 ton Ranked 83th.	1.04 million ton Ranked 31st. 11 times more than New Zealand
Transfers in > Per capita	-1.296 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st.	-3.989 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 3 times more than New Zealand
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	4.84 ton Ranked 22nd. 82% more than Sweden	2.66 ton Ranked 34th.
Consumption by transportation industry per 1000	16.21 ton Ranked 8th. 98% more than Sweden	8.2 ton Ranked 15th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation