Energy > Motor Gasoline Stats: compare key data on Cuba & Poland

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Cuba	Poland	HISTORY
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	20.3 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 129 times more than Poland	0.157 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 59th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	4.87 ton Ranked 4th. 37 times more than Poland	0.131 ton Ranked 34th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	4.87 ton Ranked 4th. 37 times more than Poland	0.131 ton Ranked 34th.
Consumption by transportation industry	337,000 ton Ranked 91st.	3.94 million ton Ranked 26th. 12 times more than Cuba
Consumption in road transport	337,000 ton Ranked 91st.	3.94 million ton Ranked 26th. 12 times more than Cuba
Consumption in road transport per 1000	29.84 ton Ranked 121st.	103.31 ton Ranked 80th. 3 times more than Cuba
Exports	237,000 ton Ranked 34th.	696,000 ton Ranked 41st. 3 times more than Cuba
Gross inland availability per 1000	34.71 ton Ranked 123th.	104.28 ton Ranked 84th. 3 times more than Cuba
Imports > Per capita	4.61 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 150th.	15.88 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 119th. 3 times more than Cuba
Imports per 1000	4.6 ton Ranked 134th.	15.88 ton Ranked 103th. 3 times more than Cuba
Motor gasoline- energy balance requirement	52,000 ton Ranked 84th.	-137,000 ton Ranked 155th.
Motor gasoline- energy balance requirement > Per capita	4,614.27 ton per 1 million people Ranked 120th.	-3,589.634 ton per 1 million people Ranked 150th.
Motor gasoline- energy balance requirement per 1000	4.6 ton Ranked 106th.	-3.59 ton Ranked 136th.
Net inland availability per 1000	34.71 ton Ranked 120th.	103.63 ton Ranked 82nd. 3 times more than Cuba
Transfers in per million	-275.765 ton Ranked 1st.	-1,293.317 ton Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Cuba
Gross inland availability	392,000 ton Ranked 86th.	3.98 million ton Ranked 26th. 10 times more than Cuba
Transfers in	-3,000 ton Ranked 1st.	-50,000 ton Ranked 5th. 17 times more than Cuba
Transfers out > Per capita	0.74 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 13% more than Poland	0.655 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th.
Production from refineries	340,000 ton Ranked 80th.	4.12 million ton Ranked 28th. 12 times more than Cuba
Consumption by households and other consumers	225,000 ton Ranked 5th. 38 times more than Poland	6,000 ton Ranked 44th.
Production from refineries per 1000	30.11 ton Ranked 72nd.	107.87 ton Ranked 54th. 4 times more than Cuba
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per 1000	0.46 ton Ranked 4th. 60% more than Poland	0.287 ton Ranked 9th.
Exports per 1000	22.36 ton Ranked 31st. 23% more than Poland	18.24 ton Ranked 53th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	4.88 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 37 times more than Poland	0.131 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 35th.
Consumption by industry and construction	55,000 ton Ranked 8th. 11 times more than Poland	5,000 ton Ranked 24th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	55,000 ton Ranked 8th. 11 times more than Poland	5,000 ton Ranked 24th.
Exports > Per capita	22.49 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 32nd. 23% more than Poland	18.24 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 55th.
Imports	52,000 ton Ranked 115th.	606,000 ton Ranked 35th. 12 times more than Cuba
Gross inland availability > Per capita	34.78 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 139th.	104.28 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 98th. 3 times more than Cuba
Net transfers > Per capita	0.463 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th.	0.655 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 41% more than Cuba
Net transfers	5,000 ton Ranked 6th.	25,000 ton Ranked 6th. 5 times more than Cuba
Net inland availability	392,000 ton Ranked 87th.	3.96 million ton Ranked 26th. 10 times more than Cuba
Net inland availability > Per capita	34.78 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 135th.	103.63 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 95th. 3 times more than Cuba
Production from refineries > Per capita	30.17 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 75th.	107.87 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 57th. 4 times more than Cuba
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	5,000 ton Ranked 3rd.	11,000 ton Ranked 5th. 2 times more than Cuba
Consumption in road transport > Per capita	29.9 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 134th.	103.31 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 92nd. 3 times more than Cuba
Net transfers per 1000	0.46 ton Ranked 5th.	0.655 ton Ranked 8th. 43% more than Cuba
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	20.27 ton Ranked 1st. 129 times more than Poland	0.157 ton Ranked 55th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	4.88 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 37 times more than Poland	0.131 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 35th.
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	29.9 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 136th.	103.34 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 94th. 3 times more than Cuba
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses > Per capita	0.463 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 61% more than Poland	0.287 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	91.54 billion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 86th. 3 times more than Poland	26.19 billion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 33th.
Total > Production > Per capita	30.17 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 75th.	107.87 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 57th. 4 times more than Cuba
Transfers out	8,000 ton Ranked 6th.	25,000 ton Ranked 6th. 3 times more than Cuba
Transfers in > Per capita	-0.278 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st.	-1.293 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Cuba
Consumption by transportation industry per 1000	29.84 ton Ranked 122nd.	103.34 ton Ranked 81st. 3 times more than Cuba
Transfers out per 1000	0.735 ton Ranked 5th. 12% more than Poland	0.655 ton Ranked 7th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation