Energy > Coke Oven Coke Stats: compare key data on Norway & Poland

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Norway	Poland	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	24,000 ton Ranked 17th.	490,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 20 times more than Norway
Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	5,333.95 ton per 1 million people Ranked 4th.	-3,718.245 ton per 1 million people Ranked 21st.
Consumption by chemical industry	36,000 ton Ranked 4th.	55,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 53% more than Norway
Consumption by other industries and construction	17,000 ton Ranked 29th.	446,000 ton Ranked 4th. 26 times more than Norway
Conversion in blast furnaces	162,000 ton Ranked 36th.	2.06 million ton Ranked 17th. 13 times more than Norway
Conversion in blast furnaces > Per capita	35.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.	53.84 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st. 54% more than Norway
Conversion to other forms of energy	162,000 ton Ranked 37th.	2.14 million ton Ranked 17th. 13 times more than Norway
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	35.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th.	56.12 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd. 60% more than Norway
Energy balance requirement	356,000 ton Ranked 16th.	-5,294,000 ton Ranked 65th.
Exports	2,000 ton Ranked 27th.	4.95 million ton Ranked 2nd. 2475 times more than Norway
Exports > Per capita	0.433 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.	129.7 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 300 times more than Norway
Gross inland availability	356,000 ton Ranked 38th.	3.5 million ton Ranked 12th. 10 times more than Norway
Gross inland availability > Per capita	77 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th.	91.63 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st. 19% more than Norway
Imports	382,000 ton Ranked 18th. 3 times more than Poland	146,000 ton Ranked 26th.
Imports > Per capita	82.62 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 22 times more than Poland	3.83 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	58.83 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 73% more than Poland	33.98 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 15th.
Imports per 1000	82.63 ton Ranked 4th. 22 times more than Poland	3.83 ton Ranked 30th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	47.15 ton Ranked 7th. 3 times more than Poland	14.59 ton Ranked 20th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	77 ton Ranked 23th.	91.63 ton Ranked 20th. 19% more than Norway
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	35.04 ton Ranked 25th.	56.12 ton Ranked 21st. 60% more than Norway
Energy balance requirement per 1000	77 ton Ranked 4th.	-138.712 ton Ranked 63th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	3.68 ton Ranked 21st.	11.69 ton Ranked 3rd. 3 times more than Norway
Consumption by households and other consumers	1,000 ton Ranked 15th.	239,000 ton Ranked 2nd. 239 times more than Norway
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	77 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th.	-138.712 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 64th.
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	7.79 ton Ranked 1st. 5 times more than Poland	1.44 ton Ranked 5th.
Consumption by households per 1000	0.216 ton Ranked 10th.	2.75 ton Ranked 3rd. 13 times more than Norway
Changes in stocks per million	5,191.11 ton Ranked 6th.	12,838.84 ton Ranked 2nd. 2 times more than Norway
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	3.68 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st.	11.69 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 3 times more than Norway
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	58.62 ton Ranked 4th. 2 times more than Poland	27.72 ton Ranked 16th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	7.79 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 5 times more than Poland	1.44 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th.
Consumption by households	1,000 ton Ranked 11th.	105,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 105 times more than Norway
Consumption by households > Per capita	0.216 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th.	2.75 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 13 times more than Norway
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	0.216 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th.	6.26 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 29 times more than Norway
Consumption by iron and steel industry	218,000 ton Ranked 27th.	557,000 ton Ranked 15th. 3 times more than Norway
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	47.15 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 3 times more than Poland	14.59 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	58.62 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 2 times more than Poland	27.72 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th.
Consumption by industry and construction	271,000 ton Ranked 26th.	1.06 million ton Ranked 13th. 4 times more than Norway
Statistical differences > Per capita	-16,871,066,121,601.5 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 19th. 644 times more than Poland	-26,201,708,613.418 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 11th.
Net inland availability	272,000 ton Ranked 26th.	1.3 million ton Ranked 10th. 5 times more than Norway
Net inland availability per 1000	58.83 ton Ranked 5th. 73% more than Poland	33.98 ton Ranked 15th.
Exports per 1000	0.433 ton Ranked 25th.	129.7 ton Ranked 1st. 300 times more than Norway
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	0.216 ton Ranked 12th.	6.26 ton Ranked 3rd. 29 times more than Norway
Conversion in blast furnaces per 1000	35.04 ton Ranked 24th.	53.84 ton Ranked 20th. 54% more than Norway

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation