Energy > Coal Stats: compare key data on Canada & Chile

Compare vs for

Definitions

Changes in stocks > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption: Billion short tons of coal consumed per country per year.
Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption per capita: Billion short tons of coal consumed per country per year. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Production > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Recoverable > Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Additional resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Coal: consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Coal: consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Per $ GDP: Coal: consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05 Per $ GDP figures expressed per $1 of Gross Domestic Product.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Coal: consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Total known > Reserves > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 population.
Total resources in place > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 population.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Changes in stocks at producers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Total known > Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Total resources in place per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Additional resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 population.
Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Conversion in coke ovens per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Conversion in coke ovens > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Canada	Chile
Changes in stocks	-2,070,000 ton Ranked 50th.	122,000 ton Ranked 18th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-64.089 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 48th.	7.49 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 23th.
Consumption	67 million Ranked 9th. 13 times more than Chile	5.1 million Ranked 16th.
Consumption by households > Per capita	0.372 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th.	0.634 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th. 70% more than Canada
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	0.372 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 44th.	1.47 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 35th. 4 times more than Canada
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	56.47 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th. 36% more than Chile	41.42 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	56.45 ton Ranked 27th. 37% more than Chile	41.32 ton Ranked 35th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	1.82 million ton Ranked 18th. 3 times more than Chile	592,000 ton Ranked 27th.
Consumption per capita	2.18 Ranked 5th. 7 times more than Chile	0.33 Ranked 14th.
Production	28.59 million ton Ranked 13th. 53 times more than Chile	544,000 ton Ranked 34th.
Production > Per capita	885.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 27 times more than Chile	33.38 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 31st.
Production per 1000	884.69 ton Ranked 13th. 27 times more than Chile	33.3 ton Ranked 31st.
Recoverable > Reserves	3.47 billion ton Ranked 11th. 112 times more than Chile	31 million ton Ranked 37th.
Recoverable > Reserves per capita	107.42 ton Ranked 11th. 57 times more than Chile	1.9 ton Ranked 34th.
Total known > Reserves	8.62 billion ton Ranked 4th. 109 times more than Chile	79 million ton Ranked 33th.
Additional resources	26.05 billion ton Ranked 6th. 208 times more than Chile	125 million ton Ranked 27th.
Additional resources per capita	868.54 ton Ranked 6th. 97 times more than Chile	8.96 ton Ranked 26th.
Total resources in place	8.62 billion ton Ranked 4th. 42 times more than Chile	204 million ton Ranked 34th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	1.1 Ranked 14th. 11 times more than Chile	0.1 Ranked 37th.
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	317.07 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th. 71% more than Chile	185.52 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	14.53 million ton Ranked 18th. 4 times more than Chile	3.73 million ton Ranked 34th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	467.72 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 32nd. 72% more than Chile	271.62 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 40th.
Gross inland availability	15.11 million ton Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Chile	4.43 million ton Ranked 35th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	30.5 Ranked 14th. 12 times more than Chile	2.5 Ranked 39th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Per $ GDP	2.98e-11 per $1 Ranked 21st. 2 times more than Chile	1.48e-11 per $1 Ranked 33th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.953 Ranked 10th. 6 times more than Chile	0.155 Ranked 36th.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	449.86 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th. 97% more than Chile	228.66 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th.
Consumption by households per 1000	0.371 ton Ranked 28th.	0.632 ton Ranked 28th. 70% more than Canada
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.354 ton Ranked 30th. 16% more than Chile	0.306 ton Ranked 33th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	56.45 ton Ranked 19th. 56% more than Chile	36.24 ton Ranked 34th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	56.47 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st. 55% more than Chile	36.33 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 35th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.137 ton Ranked 29th.	5.08 ton Ranked 25th. 37 times more than Canada
Total known > Reserves > Per capita	282.79 ton per capita Ranked 5th. 50 times more than Chile	5.68 ton per capita Ranked 30th.
Total resources in place > Per capita	282.79 ton per capita Ranked 5th. 19 times more than Chile	14.66 ton per capita Ranked 29th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.137 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th.	5.09 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th. 37 times more than Canada
Energy balance requirement	15.11 million ton Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Chile	4.43 million ton Ranked 35th.
Changes in stocks per million	-64,062.887 ton Ranked 47th.	7,467.37 ton Ranked 22nd.
Changes in stocks at producers per 1000	-12.451 ton Ranked 13th.	-16.048 ton Ranked 16th. 29% more than Canada
Net inland availability per 1000	56.82 ton Ranked 31st. 33% more than Chile	42.78 ton Ranked 42nd.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	449.68 ton Ranked 27th. 97% more than Chile	228.06 ton Ranked 35th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	467.54 ton Ranked 31st. 73% more than Chile	270.91 ton Ranked 40th.
Total known > Reserves per capita	282.79 ton Ranked 5th. 50 times more than Chile	5.66 ton Ranked 32nd.
Total resources in place per capita	282.79 ton Ranked 5th. 19 times more than Chile	14.61 ton Ranked 30th.
Imports per 1000	391.15 ton Ranked 20th. 60% more than Chile	245.08 ton Ranked 24th.
Conversion in coke ovens	4.29 million ton Ranked 16th. 6 times more than Chile	703,000 ton Ranked 34th.
Changes in stocks at producers	-359,000 ton Ranked 17th. 60% more than Chile	-224,000 ton Ranked 15th.
Additional resources > Per capita	868.54 ton per capita Ranked 6th. 97 times more than Chile	8.98 ton per capita Ranked 25th.
Consumption by households	12,000 ton Ranked 25th. 20% more than Chile	10,000 ton Ranked 27th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	12,000 ton Ranked 39th.	24,000 ton Ranked 35th. Twice as much as Canada
Consumption by industry and construction	1.82 million ton Ranked 23th. 3 times more than Chile	675,000 ton Ranked 32nd.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-54,924,301,061,952.398 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 41st.	61.37 billion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 24th.
Imports > Per capita	391.31 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st. 59% more than Chile	245.72 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th.
Net inland availability	1.84 million ton Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Chile	699,000 ton Ranked 31st.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	467.72 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 32nd. 72% more than Chile	271.62 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 40th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	56.84 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th. 33% more than Chile	42.9 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 42nd.
Conversion in coke ovens per 1000	132.74 ton Ranked 17th. 3 times more than Chile	43.03 ton Ranked 28th.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	467.54 ton Ranked 31st. 73% more than Chile	270.91 ton Ranked 40th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	4,000 ton Ranked 28th.	83,000 ton Ranked 30th. 21 times more than Canada
Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	-12.451 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th.	-16.096 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th. 29% more than Canada
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.354 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th. 15% more than Chile	0.307 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th.
Conversion in thermal power plants	10.24 million ton Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Chile	3.02 million ton Ranked 31st.
Conversion in coke ovens > Per capita	132.79 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th. 3 times more than Chile	43.14 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 29th.
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	316.94 ton Ranked 25th. 71% more than Chile	185.03 ton Ranked 35th.
Imports	12.64 million ton Ranked 15th. 3 times more than Chile	4 million ton Ranked 28th.
Consumption by other consumers	11,000 ton Ranked 26th. 2 times more than Chile	5,000 ton Ranked 33th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	0.371 ton Ranked 44th.	1.47 ton Ranked 35th. 4 times more than Canada

SOURCES: Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Canada and Chile in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather

Energy > Coal Stats: compare key data on Canada & Chile

Definitions

Citation

Compare Canada and Chile in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Canada and Chile in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation