×

Energy > Residual fuel oil Stats: compare key data on Cuba & Poland

Compare vs for  

Definitions

STAT Cuba Poland HISTORY
Consumption by households and other consumers 14,000 ton
Ranked 61st.
183,000 ton
Ranked 24th. 13 times more than Cuba

Consumption by industry and construction 113,000 ton
Ranked 71st.
402,000 ton
Ranked 43th. 4 times more than Cuba

Consumption by industry and construction per 1000 10.01 ton
Ranked 79th.
10.53 ton
Ranked 75th. 5% more than Cuba

Consumption for non-energy uses 2,000 ton
Ranked 11th.
21,000 ton
Ranked 5th. 11 times more than Cuba

Consumption in agriculture 2,000 ton
Ranked 42nd.
183,000 ton
Ranked 6th. 92 times more than Cuba

Consumption in agriculture > Per capita 0.177 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 37th.
4.79 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 8th. 27 times more than Cuba

Consumption in inland and coastal waterways 90,000 ton
Ranked 19th. 90 times more than Poland
1,000 ton
Ranked 35th.

Consumption in inland and coastal waterways > Per capita 8.33 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 16th. 320 times more than Poland
0.026 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 35th.

Conversion in other energy-producing plants 131,000 ton
Ranked 8th. 5 times more than Poland
27,000 ton
Ranked 19th.

Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita 12.34 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 6th. 17 times more than Poland
0.707 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 23th.

Conversion in thermal power plants 2.61 million ton
Ranked 17th. 5 times more than Poland
534,000 ton
Ranked 51st.

Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita 231.69 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 18th. 17 times more than Poland
13.99 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 83th.

Conversion to other forms of energy 2.61 million ton
Ranked 18th. 5 times more than Poland
561,000 ton
Ranked 51st.

Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000 231.22 ton
Ranked 13th. 16 times more than Poland
14.7 ton
Ranked 78th.

Imports > Per capita 171.62 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 31st. 503 times more than Poland
0.341 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 136th.

Imports 1.93 million ton
Ranked 14th. 149 times more than Poland
13,000 ton
Ranked 123th.

Net inland availability > Per capita 11.27 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 94th.
15.33 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 85th. 36% more than Cuba

Bunkers > Per capita 5.15 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 61st.
5.55 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 59th. 8% more than Cuba

Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita 10.03 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 75th. 26% more than Poland
7.96 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 78th.

Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000 1.24 ton
Ranked 62nd.
4.79 ton
Ranked 33th. 4 times more than Cuba

Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita 0.19 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 10th.
0.544 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 5th. 3 times more than Cuba

Bunkers 58,000 ton
Ranked 56th.
212,000 ton
Ranked 41st. 4 times more than Cuba

Consumption by energy sector 17,000 ton
Ranked 61st.
712,000 ton
Ranked 18th. 42 times more than Cuba

Consumption by households > Per capita 3.52 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 13th. 97% more than Poland
1.78 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 12th.
Consumption by households 38,000 ton
Ranked 8th.
68,000 ton
Ranked 6th. 79% more than Cuba
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita 1.51 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 56th.
18.66 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 25th. 12 times more than Cuba

Consumption by other energy producers > Per capita 1.51 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 5th. 58 times more than Poland
0.026 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 6th.
Consumption by other consumers 12,000 ton
Ranked 47th.
25,000 ton
Ranked 38th. 2 times more than Cuba

Consumption by other consumers > Per capita 1.06 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 53th. 63% more than Poland
0.655 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 58th.

Consumption by other energy producers 17,000 ton
Ranked 5th. 17 times more than Poland
1,000 ton
Ranked 6th.
Bunkers per 1000 5.14 ton
Ranked 56th.
5.55 ton
Ranked 54th. 8% more than Cuba

Changes in stocks per million 1,330.57 ton
Ranked 28th. 10 times more than Poland
130.95 ton
Ranked 39th.

Consumption by households per 1000 3.49 ton
Ranked 13th. 96% more than Poland
1.78 ton
Ranked 12th.
Consumption by other energy producers per 1000 1.51 ton
Ranked 5th. 57 times more than Poland
0.0262 ton
Ranked 6th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000 10.01 ton
Ranked 71st. 26% more than Poland
7.97 ton
Ranked 74th.

Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000 12.26 ton
Ranked 6th. 17 times more than Poland
0.707 ton
Ranked 23th.

Imports per 1000 171.27 ton
Ranked 26th. 503 times more than Poland
0.341 ton
Ranked 126th.

Consumption by energy sector per 1000 1.51 ton
Ranked 54th.
18.66 ton
Ranked 22nd. 12 times more than Cuba

Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000 231.22 ton
Ranked 13th. 17 times more than Poland
13.99 ton
Ranked 76th.

Net inland availability per 1000 11.25 ton
Ranked 86th.
15.33 ton
Ranked 78th. 36% more than Cuba

Consumption in agriculture per 1000 0.177 ton
Ranked 36th.
4.79 ton
Ranked 8th. 27 times more than Cuba

Changes in stocks 15,000 ton
Ranked 31st. 3 times more than Poland
5,000 ton
Ranked 37th.

Changes in stocks > Per capita 1.33 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 28th. 10 times more than Poland
0.131 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 40th.

Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita 1.24 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 67th.
4.79 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 38th. 4 times more than Cuba

Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita 10.03 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 83th.
10.53 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 79th. 5% more than Cuba

Consumption by other industries and construction 113,000 ton
Ranked 68th.
304,000 ton
Ranked 48th. 3 times more than Cuba

Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita 8.33 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 19th. 20 times more than Poland
0.414 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 39th.

Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000 0.189 ton
Ranked 10th.
0.544 ton
Ranked 5th. 3 times more than Cuba

Consumption in inland and coastal waterways per 1000 8.27 ton
Ranked 16th. 320 times more than Poland
0.0259 ton
Ranked 35th.

Net inland availability 127,000 ton
Ranked 75th.
585,000 ton
Ranked 40th. 5 times more than Cuba

Consumption by other consumers per 1000 1.06 ton
Ranked 48th. 62% more than Poland
0.655 ton
Ranked 52nd.

Consumption by transportation industry 90,000 ton
Ranked 22nd. 6 times more than Poland
16,000 ton
Ranked 32nd.

Consumption by transportation industry per 1000 8.27 ton
Ranked 19th. 20 times more than Poland
0.414 ton
Ranked 39th.

Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita 231.69 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 18th. 16 times more than Poland
14.7 ton per 1,000 people
Ranked 85th.

SOURCES: Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×