Energy > Kerosene Stats: compare key data on Brazil & Norway

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Brazil	Norway	HISTORY
Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	-0.235 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 29th.	2.55 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th.
Consumption by chemical industry	1,000 ton Ranked 7th. The same as Norway	1,000 ton Ranked 12th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.005 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th.	0.226 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 45 times more than Brazil
Consumption by households	17,000 ton Ranked 77th.	99,000 ton Ranked 36th. 6 times more than Brazil
Consumption by households > Per capita	0.091 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 137th.	21.41 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 27th. 235 times more than Brazil
Consumption by households and other consumers	17,000 ton Ranked 90th.	105,000 ton Ranked 38th. 6 times more than Brazil
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	0.091 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 154th.	22.71 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 29th. 250 times more than Brazil
Consumption by industry and construction	7,000 ton Ranked 31st. 40% more than Norway	5,000 ton Ranked 38th.
Consumption by other consumers	1,000 ton Ranked 35th.	5,000 ton Ranked 38th. 5 times more than Brazil
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.006 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 38th.	1.08 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th. 180 times more than Brazil
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.032 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 55th.	1.12 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 35 times more than Brazil
Consumption for non-energy uses	23,000 ton Ranked 4th. 23 times more than Norway	1,000 ton Ranked 5th.
Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	0.123 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th.	0.224 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 82% more than Brazil
Gross inland availability per 1000	0.252 ton Ranked 152nd.	27.25 ton Ranked 26th. 108 times more than Brazil
Imports	65,000 ton Ranked 30th. 65 times more than Norway	1,000 ton Ranked 121st.
Production from refineries > Per capita	0.22 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 87th.	30.93 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 141 times more than Brazil
Production from refineries	41,000 ton Ranked 54th.	143,000 ton Ranked 38th. 3 times more than Brazil
Consumption for non-energy uses per million	123.56 ton Ranked 5th.	224.12 ton Ranked 3rd. 81% more than Brazil
Exports	3,000 ton Ranked 42nd.	28,000 ton Ranked 22nd. 9 times more than Brazil
Consumption in agriculture	1,000 ton Ranked 21st. The same as Norway	1,000 ton Ranked 15th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	0.0322 ton Ranked 54th.	1.12 ton Ranked 20th. 35 times more than Brazil
Imports per 1000	0.367 ton Ranked 101st. 70% more than Norway	0.216 ton Ranked 105th.
Changes in stocks at producers per 1000	-0.236 ton Ranked 29th.	2.55 ton Ranked 6th.
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.00543 ton Ranked 8th.	0.226 ton Ranked 7th. 42 times more than Brazil
Exports per 1000	0.0167 ton Ranked 46th.	6.06 ton Ranked 15th. 362 times more than Brazil
Statistical differences > Per capita	-10,874,736,627.471 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 34th.	4.54 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 7th.
Total > Production	41,000 ton Ranked 54th.	143,000 ton Ranked 38th. 3 times more than Brazil
Net inland availability > Per capita	0.129 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 158th.	22.71 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th. 176 times more than Brazil
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	32.19 ton per million people Ranked 120th.	-3,677.026 ton per million people Ranked 133th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-32.187 ton per million people Ranked 21st.	-2,162.956 ton per million people Ranked 44th. 67 times more than Brazil
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	0.006 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.	0.216 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 36 times more than Brazil
Energy balance requirement	6,000 ton Ranked 81st.	-17,000 ton Ranked 130th.
Imports > Per capita	0.369 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 99th. 71% more than Norway	0.216 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 113th.
Net inland availability	24,000 ton Ranked 78th.	105,000 ton Ranked 40th. 4 times more than Brazil
Changes in stocks at producers	-37,000 ton Ranked 35th.	11,000 ton Ranked 14th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	0.038 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 56th.	1.12 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 30 times more than Brazil
Consumption by other industries and construction	6,000 ton Ranked 31st. 20% more than Norway	5,000 ton Ranked 36th.
Exports > Per capita	0.017 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 45th.	6.06 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th. 356 times more than Brazil
Gross inland availability > Per capita	0.252 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 163th.	27.25 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th. 108 times more than Brazil
Gross inland availability	47,000 ton Ranked 61st.	126,000 ton Ranked 38th. 3 times more than Brazil
Energy balance requirement per million	32.23 ton Ranked 112th.	-3,677.034 ton Ranked 125th.
Total > Production per 1000	0.22 ton Ranked 83th.	30.93 ton Ranked 18th. 140 times more than Brazil
Net inland availability per 1000	0.129 ton Ranked 149th.	22.71 ton Ranked 22nd. 176 times more than Brazil
Production from refineries per 1000	0.22 ton Ranked 83th.	30.93 ton Ranked 18th. 140 times more than Brazil
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	0.0376 ton Ranked 55th.	1.12 ton Ranked 20th. 30 times more than Brazil
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.00608 ton Ranked 38th.	1.08 ton Ranked 32nd. 178 times more than Brazil
Consumption by households per 1000	0.0913 ton Ranked 129th.	21.41 ton Ranked 21st. 234 times more than Brazil
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	0.0913 ton Ranked 144th.	22.71 ton Ranked 21st. 249 times more than Brazil
Consumption in agriculture per 1000	0.00637 ton Ranked 25th.	0.216 ton Ranked 8th. 34 times more than Brazil

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation