Energy > Motor Gasoline Stats: compare key data on Belarus & Estonia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Belarus	Estonia	HISTORY
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	51.25 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 69 times more than Estonia	0.743 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 47th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	0.921 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th. 24% more than Estonia	0.743 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 23th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	8,000 ton Ranked 19th. 8 times more than Estonia	1,000 ton Ranked 34th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.818 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 19th. 10% more than Estonia	0.743 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 23th.
Consumption by transportation industry	523,000 ton Ranked 77th. 82% more than Estonia	288,000 ton Ranked 103th.
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	53.5 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 121st.	213.95 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 58th. 4 times more than Belarus
Consumption in agriculture	33,000 ton Ranked 9th. 33 times more than Estonia	1,000 ton Ranked 35th.
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	3.38 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 5 times more than Estonia	0.743 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st.
Consumption in road transport	523,000 ton Ranked 77th. 82% more than Estonia	288,000 ton Ranked 103th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	13,000 ton Ranked 1st. 13 times more than Estonia	1,000 ton Ranked 7th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses > Per capita	1.28 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 76% more than Estonia	0.73 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd.
Motor gasoline- energy balance requirement	-2,297,000 ton Ranked 187th.	290,000 ton Ranked 36th.
Motor gasoline- energy balance requirement > Per capita	-234,973.006 ton per 1 million people Ranked 185th.	215,437.19 ton per 1 million people Ranked 30th.
Net inland availability	1.03 million ton Ranked 62nd. 4 times more than Estonia	290,000 ton Ranked 102nd.
Net inland availability > Per capita	105.67 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 94th.	215.44 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 58th. 2 times more than Belarus
Consumption in road transport > Per capita	53.5 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 119th.	213.95 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 56th. 4 times more than Belarus
Consumption by households per 1000	48.02 ton Ranked 1st. 2 times more than Estonia	22.23 ton Ranked 3rd.
Consumption by transportation industry per 1000	54.12 ton Ranked 107th.	213.95 ton Ranked 46th. 4 times more than Belarus
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.414 ton Ranked 28th.	0.741 ton Ranked 22nd. 79% more than Belarus
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	0.931 ton Ranked 16th. 25% more than Estonia	0.743 ton Ranked 21st.
Gross inland availability per 1000	106.9 ton Ranked 82nd.	215.44 ton Ranked 47th. 2 times more than Belarus
Motor gasoline- energy balance requirement per 1000	-237.711 ton Ranked 169th.	215.44 ton Ranked 21st.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	0.828 ton Ranked 19th. 11% more than Estonia	0.743 ton Ranked 21st.
Consumption in road transport per 1000	54.12 ton Ranked 106th.	213.95 ton Ranked 45th. 4 times more than Belarus
Imports per 1000	0.103 ton Ranked 161st.	219.15 ton Ranked 23th. 2118 times more than Belarus
Net inland availability per 1000	106.9 ton Ranked 80th.	215.44 ton Ranked 46th. 2 times more than Belarus
Imports > Per capita	0.102 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 178th.	219.15 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th. 2149 times more than Belarus
Gross inland availability	1.03 million ton Ranked 61st. 4 times more than Estonia	290,000 ton Ranked 100th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	501,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 501 times more than Estonia	1,000 ton Ranked 60th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per 1000	1.28 ton Ranked 3rd. 76% more than Estonia	0.73 ton Ranked 3rd.
Consumption by households > Per capita	47.47 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than Estonia	22.24 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th.
Consumption by households	464,000 ton Ranked 2nd. 15 times more than Estonia	30,000 ton Ranked 6th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.409 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th.	0.741 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th. 81% more than Belarus
Consumption by other consumers	4,000 ton Ranked 28th. 4 times more than Estonia	1,000 ton Ranked 39th.
Consumption by industry and construction	9,000 ton Ranked 19th. 9 times more than Estonia	1,000 ton Ranked 34th.
Imports	1,000 ton Ranked 178th.	295,000 ton Ranked 58th. 295 times more than Belarus
Gross inland availability > Per capita	105.67 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 97th.	215.44 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 60th. 2 times more than Belarus
Statistical differences > Per capita	-2,228,080,949,826.86 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 53th.	38.96 trillion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 9th.
Consumption in agriculture per 1000	3.42 ton Ranked 7th. 5 times more than Estonia	0.743 ton Ranked 21st.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	51.85 ton Ranked 1st. 70 times more than Estonia	0.743 ton Ranked 42nd.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation