Energy > Residual fuel oil Stats: compare key data on Belarus & Estonia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Belarus	Estonia	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	5,000 ton Ranked 33th. 3 times more than Estonia	2,000 ton Ranked 37th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	0.511 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th.	1.49 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th. 3 times more than Belarus
Consumption by chemical industry	53,000 ton Ranked 27th. 53 times more than Estonia	1,000 ton Ranked 42nd.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	5.42 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th. 7 times more than Estonia	0.73 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	6,000 ton Ranked 75th. 20% more than Estonia	5,000 ton Ranked 80th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	0.614 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 74th.	3.71 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 43th. 6 times more than Belarus
Consumption by industry and construction	436,000 ton Ranked 41st. 11 times more than Estonia	41,000 ton Ranked 94th.
Consumption in agriculture	1,000 ton Ranked 44th. The same as Estonia	1,000 ton Ranked 48th.
Consumption in agriculture per 1000	0.103 ton Ranked 38th.	0.741 ton Ranked 27th. 7 times more than Belarus
Consumption in rail transport > Per capita	0.1 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th.	2.14 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 21 times more than Belarus
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	430,000 ton Ranked 4th. 6 times more than Estonia	74,000 ton Ranked 9th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	43.99 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th.	54.97 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 25% more than Belarus
Conversion in thermal power plants	499,000 ton Ranked 53th. 50 times more than Estonia	10,000 ton Ranked 113th.
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	51.05 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 52nd. 7 times more than Estonia	7.43 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 96th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	96.14 ton Ranked 35th. 54% more than Estonia	62.4 ton Ranked 44th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	929,000 ton Ranked 40th. 11 times more than Estonia	84,000 ton Ranked 90th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses > Per capita	0.684 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st.	2.22 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 3 times more than Belarus
Imports > Per capita	26.39 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 64th.	65.37 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 49th. 2 times more than Belarus
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	0.102 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.	0.741 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th. 7 times more than Belarus
Imports	258,000 ton Ranked 59th. 3 times more than Estonia	88,000 ton Ranked 87th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	45.22 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 50th. 32% more than Estonia	34.17 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 60th.
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	0.1 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 47th.	0.733 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th. 7 times more than Belarus
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	0.621 ton Ranked 68th.	3.71 ton Ranked 41st. 6 times more than Belarus
Consumption by other consumers	5,000 ton Ranked 60th. The same as Estonia	5,000 ton Ranked 61st.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.511 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 62nd.	3.71 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 32nd. 7 times more than Belarus
Changes in stocks per million	517.44 ton Ranked 33th.	1,485.78 ton Ranked 26th. 3 times more than Belarus
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	39.64 ton Ranked 28th. 30% more than Estonia	30.46 ton Ranked 40th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	44.5 ton Ranked 4th.	54.97 ton Ranked 1st. 24% more than Belarus
Imports per 1000	26.7 ton Ranked 55th.	65.37 ton Ranked 42nd. 2 times more than Belarus
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	5.48 ton Ranked 14th. 8 times more than Estonia	0.73 ton Ranked 36th.
Consumption in rail transport per million	99.65 ton Ranked 7th.	2,143.57 ton Ranked 2nd. 22 times more than Belarus
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	51.64 ton Ranked 47th. 7 times more than Estonia	7.43 ton Ranked 89th.
Net inland availability per 1000	45.74 ton Ranked 42nd. 34% more than Estonia	34.17 ton Ranked 54th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	45.12 ton Ranked 29th. 48% more than Estonia	30.46 ton Ranked 47th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	44.6 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 32nd. 46% more than Estonia	30.46 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 49th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	383,000 ton Ranked 41st. 9 times more than Estonia	41,000 ton Ranked 92nd.
Consumption in rail transport	1,000 ton Ranked 8th.	3,000 ton Ranked 8th. 3 times more than Belarus
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	39.18 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th. 29% more than Estonia	30.46 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 43th.
Net inland availability	442,000 ton Ranked 50th. 10 times more than Estonia	46,000 ton Ranked 107th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.517 ton Ranked 57th.	3.71 ton Ranked 29th. 7 times more than Belarus
Consumption by transportation industry	1,000 ton Ranked 48th. The same as Estonia	1,000 ton Ranked 47th.
Consumption by transportation industry per 1000	0.0997 ton Ranked 47th.	0.733 ton Ranked 36th. 7 times more than Belarus
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	95.03 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 41st. 52% more than Estonia	62.4 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 50th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation