Energy > Residual fuel oil Stats: compare key data on Japan & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Japan	Latvia	HISTORY
Consumption by households and other consumers	408,000 ton Ranked 12th. 31 times more than Latvia	13,000 ton Ranked 64th.
Consumption by industry and construction	6.24 million ton Ranked 6th. 520 times more than Latvia	12,000 ton Ranked 109th.
Consumption in agriculture	408,000 ton Ranked 2nd. 102 times more than Latvia	4,000 ton Ranked 37th.
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	3.19 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 84% more than Latvia	1.74 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways	2.69 million ton Ranked 2nd. 1346 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 35th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways > Per capita	21.07 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 25 times more than Latvia	0.83 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	23,000 ton Ranked 20th.	38,000 ton Ranked 15th. 65% more than Japan
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.18 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th.	16.52 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th. 92 times more than Japan
Conversion in thermal power plants	14.55 million ton Ranked 3rd. 1039 times more than Latvia	14,000 ton Ranked 112th.
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	113.86 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th. 19 times more than Latvia	6.09 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 99th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	14.57 million ton Ranked 3rd. 280 times more than Latvia	52,000 ton Ranked 98th.
Imports	3.75 million ton Ranked 9th. 15 times more than Latvia	244,000 ton Ranked 61st.
Imports > Per capita	29.39 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 61st.	106.06 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 38th. 4 times more than Japan
Net transfers	-127,000 ton Ranked 17th.	-291,000 ton Ranked 20th. 2 times more than Japan
Net transfers > Per capita	-0.994 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th.	-126.494 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd. 127 times more than Japan
Net inland availability > Per capita	73.1 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th. 7 times more than Latvia	10.87 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 95th.
Transfers in	-127,000 ton Ranked 7th.	-291,000 ton Ranked 10th. 2 times more than Japan
Bunkers > Per capita	46.09 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th.	75.64 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th. 64% more than Japan
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	30.85 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 42nd. 6 times more than Latvia	5.22 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 86th.
Consumption by transportation industry per 1000	21.07 ton Ranked 7th. 25 times more than Latvia	0.83 ton Ranked 35th.
Bunkers	5.89 million ton Ranked 8th. 34 times more than Latvia	174,000 ton Ranked 43th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	629,000 ton Ranked 4th. 79 times more than Latvia	8,000 ton Ranked 33th.
Consumption by energy sector	1.76 million ton Ranked 7th. 1758 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 70th.
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	13.76 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 27th. 32 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 66th.
Bunkers per 1000	46.09 ton Ranked 29th.	75.64 ton Ranked 20th. 64% more than Japan
Changes in stocks per million	-563.499 ton Ranked 46th.	-4,346.858 ton Ranked 65th. 8 times more than Japan
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	4.92 ton Ranked 9th. 50% more than Latvia	3.29 ton Ranked 20th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	30.85 ton Ranked 39th. 6 times more than Latvia	5.22 ton Ranked 82nd.
Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries per 1000	1.32 ton Ranked 1st. 3 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton Ranked 6th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.18 ton Ranked 26th.	16.52 ton Ranked 6th. 92 times more than Japan
Imports per 1000	29.39 ton Ranked 54th.	106.06 ton Ranked 32nd. 4 times more than Japan
Net transfers per 1000	-0.994 ton Ranked 12th.	-126.494 ton Ranked 21st. 127 times more than Japan
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	13.06 ton Ranked 8th. 10 times more than Latvia	1.29 ton Ranked 34th.
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	13.76 ton Ranked 25th. 32 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton Ranked 64th.
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	113.87 ton Ranked 30th. 19 times more than Latvia	6.09 ton Ranked 92nd.
Net inland availability per 1000	73.1 ton Ranked 27th. 7 times more than Latvia	10.87 ton Ranked 88th.
Transfers in per million	-993.95 ton Ranked 3rd.	-126,493.581 ton Ranked 12th. 127 times more than Japan
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	48.84 ton Ranked 26th. 9 times more than Latvia	5.22 ton Ranked 86th.
Consumption in agriculture per 1000	3.19 ton Ranked 11th. 84% more than Latvia	1.74 ton Ranked 18th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	114.05 ton Ranked 32nd. 5 times more than Latvia	22.6 ton Ranked 72nd.
Consumption by chemical industry	1.67 million ton Ranked 4th. 556 times more than Latvia	3,000 ton Ranked 40th.
Changes in stocks	-72,000 ton Ranked 63th. 7 times more than Latvia	-10,000 ton Ranked 48th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-0.563 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 46th.	-4.347 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 65th. 8 times more than Japan
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	13.06 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th. 10 times more than Latvia	1.29 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	3.19 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 50th.	5.65 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 35th. 77% more than Japan
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	48.84 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 29th. 9 times more than Latvia	5.22 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 90th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	3.94 million ton Ranked 6th. 329 times more than Latvia	12,000 ton Ranked 109th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	4.92 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 51% more than Latvia	3.27 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th.
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	21.07 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 25 times more than Latvia	0.83 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways per 1000	21.07 ton Ranked 5th. 25 times more than Latvia	0.83 ton Ranked 26th.
Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries > Per capita	1.32 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 3 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th.
Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries	169,000 ton Ranked 1st. 169 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 8th.
Net inland availability	9.34 million ton Ranked 4th. 374 times more than Latvia	25,000 ton Ranked 121st.
Transfers in > Per capita	-0.994 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd.	-126.494 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 127 times more than Japan
Consumption by transportation industry	2.69 million ton Ranked 2nd. 1346 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 47th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	3.19 ton Ranked 45th.	5.65 ton Ranked 30th. 77% more than Japan
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	114.05 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 38th. 5 times more than Latvia	22.6 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 79th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation