Energy > Residual fuel oil Stats: compare key data on Netherlands & Poland

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Netherlands	Poland	HISTORY
Consumption by households and other consumers	22,000 ton Ranked 56th.	183,000 ton Ranked 24th. 8 times more than Netherlands
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	1.35 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 63th.	4.79 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 38th. 4 times more than Netherlands
Consumption by industry and construction	18,000 ton Ranked 103th.	402,000 ton Ranked 43th. 22 times more than Netherlands
Consumption for non-energy uses	12,000 ton Ranked 10th.	21,000 ton Ranked 5th. 75% more than Netherlands
Consumption in agriculture	7,000 ton Ranked 29th.	183,000 ton Ranked 6th. 26 times more than Netherlands
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	0.458 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 31st.	4.79 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 10 times more than Netherlands
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	243,000 ton Ranked 12th. 9 times more than Poland	27,000 ton Ranked 19th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	15.72 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 22 times more than Poland	0.707 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 23th.
Conversion in thermal power plants	10,000 ton Ranked 114th.	534,000 ton Ranked 51st. 53 times more than Netherlands
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	0.613 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 119th.	13.99 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 83th. 23 times more than Netherlands
Conversion to other forms of energy	10,000 ton Ranked 116th.	561,000 ton Ranked 51st. 56 times more than Netherlands
Imports	22.39 million ton Ranked 4th. 1723 times more than Poland	13,000 ton Ranked 123th.
Imports > Per capita	1,372.26 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 4024 times more than Poland	0.341 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 136th.
Net transfers	1.88 million ton Ranked 1st. 10 times more than Poland	188,000 ton Ranked 9th.
Net transfers > Per capita	114.95 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 24 times more than Poland	4.87 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	2.45 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 124th.	15.33 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 85th. 6 times more than Netherlands
Transfers out	1.88 million ton Ranked 1st. 10 times more than Poland	188,000 ton Ranked 9th.
Bunkers > Per capita	940.57 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 169 times more than Poland	5.55 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 59th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	1.1 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 113th.	7.96 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 78th. 7 times more than Netherlands
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	1.35 ton Ranked 46th. 2 times more than Poland	0.655 ton Ranked 52nd.
Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	11.58 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th.	18.47 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd. 60% more than Netherlands
Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	0.803 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 48% more than Poland	0.544 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th.
Bunkers	15.35 million ton Ranked 3rd. 72 times more than Poland	212,000 ton Ranked 41st.
Consumption by energy sector	189,000 ton Ranked 34th.	712,000 ton Ranked 18th. 4 times more than Netherlands
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	11.58 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th.	18.66 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th. 61% more than Netherlands
Consumption by other consumers	22,000 ton Ranked 41st.	25,000 ton Ranked 38th. 14% more than Netherlands
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	1.35 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 51st. 2 times more than Poland	0.655 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 58th.
Bunkers per 1000	940.57 ton Ranked 3rd. 169 times more than Poland	5.55 ton Ranked 54th.
Changes in stocks at producers per 1000	3.66 ton Ranked 11th. 35 times more than Poland	0.104 ton Ranked 29th.
Changes in stocks per million	15,196.2 ton Ranked 9th. 116 times more than Poland	130.95 ton Ranked 39th.
Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	11.58 ton Ranked 24th.	18.47 ton Ranked 19th. 60% more than Netherlands
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	1.1 ton Ranked 108th.	7.97 ton Ranked 74th. 7 times more than Netherlands
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	15.72 ton Ranked 12th. 22 times more than Poland	0.707 ton Ranked 23th.
Imports per 1000	1,372.25 ton Ranked 7th. 4029 times more than Poland	0.341 ton Ranked 126th.
Net transfers per 1000	114.95 ton Ranked 2nd. 24 times more than Poland	4.87 ton Ranked 10th.
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.0616 ton Ranked 41st.	2.57 ton Ranked 25th. 42 times more than Netherlands
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	11.58 ton Ranked 28th.	18.66 ton Ranked 22nd. 61% more than Netherlands
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	0.613 ton Ranked 112th.	13.99 ton Ranked 76th. 23 times more than Netherlands
Transfers out per 1000	114.95 ton Ranked 2nd. 24 times more than Poland	4.87 ton Ranked 10th.
Net inland availability per 1000	2.45 ton Ranked 117th.	15.33 ton Ranked 78th. 6 times more than Netherlands
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	1.1 ton Ranked 108th.	10.53 ton Ranked 75th. 10 times more than Netherlands
Consumption in agriculture per 1000	0.458 ton Ranked 31st.	4.79 ton Ranked 8th. 10 times more than Netherlands
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	0.613 ton Ranked 113th.	14.7 ton Ranked 78th. 24 times more than Netherlands
Changes in stocks at producers	56,000 ton Ranked 14th. 14 times more than Poland	4,000 ton Ranked 29th.
Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	3.67 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 35 times more than Poland	0.104 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th.
Consumption by chemical industry	1,000 ton Ranked 41st.	98,000 ton Ranked 20th. 98 times more than Netherlands
Changes in stocks	248,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 50 times more than Poland	5,000 ton Ranked 37th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	15.2 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th. 116 times more than Poland	0.131 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 40th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.062 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 42nd.	2.57 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th. 41 times more than Netherlands
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	1.1 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 113th.	10.53 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 79th. 10 times more than Netherlands
Consumption by petroleum refineries	189,000 ton Ranked 29th.	705,000 ton Ranked 15th. 4 times more than Netherlands
Consumption by other industries and construction	18,000 ton Ranked 102nd.	304,000 ton Ranked 48th. 17 times more than Netherlands
Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	0.803 ton Ranked 8th. 48% more than Poland	0.544 ton Ranked 5th.
Net inland availability	40,000 ton Ranked 109th.	585,000 ton Ranked 40th. 15 times more than Netherlands
Transfers out > Per capita	114.95 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 24 times more than Poland	4.87 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	1.35 ton Ranked 58th.	4.79 ton Ranked 33th. 4 times more than Netherlands
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	0.613 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 120th.	14.7 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 85th. 24 times more than Netherlands

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation