Energy > Gas-diesel oils Stats: compare key data on Brazil & Cuba

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Brazil	Cuba	HISTORY
Consumption by households and other consumers	4.99 million ton Ranked 11th. 9 times more than Cuba	537,000 ton Ranked 49th.
Consumption by industry and construction	682,000 ton Ranked 29th. 51% more than Cuba	452,000 ton Ranked 35th.
Consumption by transportation industry	27.35 million ton Ranked 4th. 140 times more than Cuba	195,000 ton Ranked 109th.
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	146.71 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 69th. 8 times more than Cuba	17.3 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 136th.
Consumption in agriculture	4.85 million ton Ranked 3rd. 29 times more than Cuba	169,000 ton Ranked 49th.
Consumption in agriculture per 1000	26.07 ton Ranked 41st. 74% more than Cuba	14.97 ton Ranked 52nd.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways	326,000 ton Ranked 13th.	418,000 ton Ranked 10th. 28% more than Brazil
Consumption in road transport	26.44 million ton Ranked 3rd. 136 times more than Cuba	195,000 ton Ranked 105th.
Consumption in road transport > Per capita	141.86 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 70th. 8 times more than Cuba	17.3 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 127th.
Consumption in road transport per 1000	142.06 ton Ranked 59th. 8 times more than Cuba	17.27 ton Ranked 115th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses > Per capita	0.032 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th.	0.444 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 14 times more than Brazil
Conversion in thermal power plants	1.94 million ton Ranked 9th. 43 times more than Cuba	45,000 ton Ranked 76th.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	10.42 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 77th. 3 times more than Cuba	3.99 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 99th.
Energy balance requirement	1.81 million ton Ranked 14th. 2 times more than Cuba	859,000 ton Ranked 31st.
Imports	2.58 million ton Ranked 17th. 2 times more than Cuba	1.25 million ton Ranked 35th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	9.69 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 136th.	76.22 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 80th. 8 times more than Brazil
Net inland availability	33.02 million ton Ranked 7th. 28 times more than Cuba	1.18 million ton Ranked 72nd.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	9.7 ton Ranked 122nd.	76.07 ton Ranked 66th. 8 times more than Brazil
Changes in stocks per 1000	-0.736 ton Ranked 60th.	33.39 ton Ranked 6th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-0.734 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 60th.	33.45 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th.
Production from refineries	33.37 million ton Ranked 7th. 84 times more than Cuba	395,000 ton Ranked 84th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	1.94 million ton Ranked 9th. 43 times more than Cuba	45,000 ton Ranked 79th.
Imports per 1000	13.87 ton Ranked 138th.	110.79 ton Ranked 67th. 8 times more than Brazil
Bunkers	639,000 ton Ranked 9th. 43 times more than Cuba	15,000 ton Ranked 69th.
Consumption by energy sector	162,000 ton Ranked 9th. 8 times more than Cuba	20,000 ton Ranked 30th.
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.869 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th.	1.77 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 2 times more than Brazil
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	3.66 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 105th.	40.11 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th. 11 times more than Brazil
Consumption by other industries and construction	501,000 ton Ranked 32nd. 11% more than Cuba	452,000 ton Ranked 34th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways > Per capita	1.75 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 40th.	38.67 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 22 times more than Brazil
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	26.03 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 43th. 74% more than Cuba	15 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 54th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	10.43 ton Ranked 65th. 3 times more than Cuba	3.99 ton Ranked 87th.
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	10.43 ton Ranked 63th. 3 times more than Cuba	3.99 ton Ranked 83th.
Consumption by other consumers	142,000 ton Ranked 43th.	368,000 ton Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Brazil
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	10.42 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 75th. 3 times more than Cuba	3.99 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 95th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	2.69 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 106th.	40.11 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 35th. 15 times more than Brazil
Consumption by petroleum refineries	5,000 ton Ranked 20th.	20,000 ton Ranked 14th. 4 times more than Brazil
Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	0.028 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 31st.	1.77 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 63 times more than Brazil
Production from refineries per 1000	179.26 ton Ranked 54th. 5 times more than Cuba	34.98 ton Ranked 80th.
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.87 ton Ranked 26th.	1.77 ton Ranked 19th. 2 times more than Brazil
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	3.66 ton Ranked 103th.	40.03 ton Ranked 35th. 11 times more than Brazil
Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	0.0275 ton Ranked 29th.	1.77 ton Ranked 6th. 64 times more than Brazil
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.763 ton Ranked 98th.	32.59 ton Ranked 29th. 43 times more than Brazil
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per 1000	0.0322 ton Ranked 11th.	0.443 ton Ranked 7th. 14 times more than Brazil
Gross inland availability	35.17 million ton Ranked 6th. 28 times more than Cuba	1.25 million ton Ranked 77th.
Imports > Per capita	13.85 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 155th.	111.01 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 83th. 8 times more than Brazil
Total > Production > Per capita	179.01 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 59th. 5 times more than Cuba	35.05 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 85th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	177.16 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 83th. 69% more than Cuba	105.06 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 108th.
Production from refineries > Per capita	179.01 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 59th. 5 times more than Cuba	35.05 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 85th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	214.59 billion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 38th.	-5,092,659,601,271.56 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 74th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	26.83 ton Ranked 63th.	47.56 ton Ranked 49th. 77% more than Brazil
Consumption by transportation industry per 1000	146.92 ton Ranked 60th. 9 times more than Cuba	17.27 ton Ranked 123th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways per 1000	1.75 ton Ranked 40th.	38.42 ton Ranked 5th. 22 times more than Brazil
Changes in stocks	-137,000 ton Ranked 79th.	377,000 ton Ranked 7th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.762 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 103th.	32.66 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 31st. 43 times more than Brazil
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	26.79 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 67th.	47.65 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 51st. 78% more than Brazil
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	6,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 20% more than Cuba	5,000 ton Ranked 6th.
Bunkers per 1000	3.43 ton Ranked 49th. 3 times more than Cuba	1.33 ton Ranked 64th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	188.7 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 104th. 70% more than Cuba	111.28 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 130th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	2.69 ton Ranked 104th.	40.03 ton Ranked 34th. 15 times more than Brazil
Net inland availability per 1000	177.41 ton Ranked 72nd. 69% more than Cuba	104.85 ton Ranked 98th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	188.96 ton Ranked 86th. 70% more than Cuba	111.05 ton Ranked 112th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation