Energy > Residual fuel oil Stats: compare key data on Canada & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Canada	Latvia	HISTORY
Bunkers	531,000 ton Ranked 28th. 3 times more than Latvia	174,000 ton Ranked 43th.
Bunkers per 1000	16.43 ton Ranked 41st.	75.64 ton Ranked 20th. 5 times more than Canada
Changes in stocks per million	-2,599.653 ton Ranked 61st.	-4,346.858 ton Ranked 65th. 67% more than Canada
Consumption by energy sector	708,000 ton Ranked 19th. 708 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 70th.
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	21.92 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st. 50 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 66th.
Consumption by households	19,000 ton Ranked 8th.	40,000 ton Ranked 6th. 2 times more than Canada
Consumption by households > Per capita	0.588 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th.	15.9 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 27 times more than Canada
Consumption by households and other consumers	1.35 million ton Ranked 4th. 104 times more than Latvia	13,000 ton Ranked 64th.
Consumption by households per 1000	0.588 ton Ranked 11th.	16.1 ton Ranked 5th. 27 times more than Canada
Consumption by industry and construction	2.16 million ton Ranked 15th. 180 times more than Latvia	12,000 ton Ranked 109th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	154,000 ton Ranked 15th. 19 times more than Latvia	8,000 ton Ranked 33th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	4.77 ton Ranked 10th. 45% more than Latvia	3.29 ton Ranked 20th.
Consumption by other consumers	1.27 million ton Ranked 3rd. 141 times more than Latvia	9,000 ton Ranked 50th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	39.35 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 10 times more than Latvia	3.91 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 31st.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	95.02 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 42nd. 4 times more than Latvia	22.6 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 79th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	60.13 ton Ranked 21st. 12 times more than Latvia	5.22 ton Ranked 82nd.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	7.7 ton Ranked 17th.	16.52 ton Ranked 6th. 2 times more than Canada
Imports per 1000	80.81 ton Ranked 36th.	106.06 ton Ranked 32nd. 31% more than Canada
Net transfers per 1000	-30.546 ton Ranked 18th.	-126.494 ton Ranked 21st. 4 times more than Canada
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	1.98 ton Ranked 29th. 54% more than Latvia	1.29 ton Ranked 34th.
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	21.91 ton Ranked 20th. 50 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton Ranked 64th.
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	94.98 ton Ranked 32nd. 16 times more than Latvia	6.09 ton Ranked 92nd.
Net inland availability per 1000	140.07 ton Ranked 13th. 13 times more than Latvia	10.87 ton Ranked 88th.
Transfers in per million	-30,545.927 ton Ranked 9th.	-126,493.581 ton Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Canada
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	66.88 ton Ranked 16th. 13 times more than Latvia	5.22 ton Ranked 86th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	94.98 ton Ranked 36th. 4 times more than Latvia	22.6 ton Ranked 72nd.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	41.95 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 7 times more than Latvia	5.65 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 35th.
Consumption in agriculture	65,000 ton Ranked 10th. 16 times more than Latvia	4,000 ton Ranked 37th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways	1.01 million ton Ranked 4th. 505 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 35th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways > Per capita	31.27 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 38 times more than Latvia	0.83 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	231,000 ton Ranked 10th. 6 times more than Latvia	38,000 ton Ranked 15th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	7.7 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 17th.	16.52 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th. 2 times more than Canada
Conversion in thermal power plants	3.07 million ton Ranked 16th. 219 times more than Latvia	14,000 ton Ranked 112th.
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	95.02 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 38th. 16 times more than Latvia	6.09 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 99th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	3.07 million ton Ranked 17th. 59 times more than Latvia	52,000 ton Ranked 98th.
Imports > Per capita	80.84 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 42nd.	106.06 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 38th. 31% more than Canada
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	2.01 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 17th. 16% more than Latvia	1.74 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th.
Imports	2.61 million ton Ranked 12th. 11 times more than Latvia	244,000 ton Ranked 61st.
Net transfers	-987,000 ton Ranked 21st. 3 times more than Latvia	-291,000 ton Ranked 20th.
Net transfers > Per capita	-30.558 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 19th.	-126.494 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd. 4 times more than Canada
Net inland availability > Per capita	140.13 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th. 13 times more than Latvia	10.87 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 95th.
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	31.27 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 38 times more than Latvia	0.83 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways per 1000	31.26 ton Ranked 3rd. 38 times more than Latvia	0.83 ton Ranked 26th.
Net inland availability	4.53 million ton Ranked 11th. 181 times more than Latvia	25,000 ton Ranked 121st.
Transfers in > Per capita	-30.558 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th.	-126.494 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Canada
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	39.34 ton Ranked 4th. 10 times more than Latvia	3.91 ton Ranked 26th.
Consumption by transportation industry	1.01 million ton Ranked 5th. 505 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 47th.
Consumption by transportation industry per 1000	31.26 ton Ranked 4th. 38 times more than Latvia	0.83 ton Ranked 35th.
Consumption in agriculture per 1000	2.01 ton Ranked 17th. 16% more than Latvia	1.74 ton Ranked 18th.
Consumption by chemical industry	64,000 ton Ranked 23th. 21 times more than Latvia	3,000 ton Ranked 40th.
Changes in stocks	-84,000 ton Ranked 65th. 8 times more than Latvia	-10,000 ton Ranked 48th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-2.601 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 61st.	-4.347 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 65th. 67% more than Canada
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	1.98 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th. 54% more than Latvia	1.29 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	66.91 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 19th. 13 times more than Latvia	5.22 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 90th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	1.94 million ton Ranked 14th. 162 times more than Latvia	12,000 ton Ranked 109th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	4.77 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 46% more than Latvia	3.27 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th.
Transfers in	-987,000 ton Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Latvia	-291,000 ton Ranked 10th.
Bunkers > Per capita	16.44 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 46th.	75.64 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th. 5 times more than Canada
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	60.16 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 23th. 12 times more than Latvia	5.22 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 86th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	41.93 ton Ranked 6th. 7 times more than Latvia	5.65 ton Ranked 30th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation