Energy > Residual fuel oil Stats: compare key data on Denmark & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Denmark	Latvia	HISTORY
Consumption by households and other consumers	26,000 ton Ranked 52nd. Twice as much as Latvia	13,000 ton Ranked 64th.
Consumption by industry and construction	149,000 ton Ranked 62nd. 12 times more than Latvia	12,000 ton Ranked 109th.
Consumption in agriculture	22,000 ton Ranked 19th. 6 times more than Latvia	4,000 ton Ranked 37th.
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	4.06 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th. 2 times more than Latvia	1.74 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways	34,000 ton Ranked 23th. 17 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 35th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways > Per capita	6.28 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th. 8 times more than Latvia	0.83 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	10,000 ton Ranked 23th.	38,000 ton Ranked 15th. 4 times more than Denmark
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	1.85 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th.	16.52 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th. 9 times more than Denmark
Conversion in thermal power plants	312,000 ton Ranked 63th. 22 times more than Latvia	14,000 ton Ranked 112th.
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	57.61 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 49th. 9 times more than Latvia	6.09 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 99th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	322,000 ton Ranked 66th. 6 times more than Latvia	52,000 ton Ranked 98th.
Imports	1.2 million ton Ranked 26th. 5 times more than Latvia	244,000 ton Ranked 61st.
Imports > Per capita	221.57 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th. 2 times more than Latvia	106.06 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 38th.
Net transfers	-4,000 ton Ranked 13th.	-291,000 ton Ranked 20th. 73 times more than Denmark
Net transfers > Per capita	-0.741 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th.	-126.494 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd. 171 times more than Denmark
Net inland availability > Per capita	38.59 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 55th. 4 times more than Latvia	10.87 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 95th.
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	6.28 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 19th. 8 times more than Latvia	0.83 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th.
Net inland availability	209,000 ton Ranked 63th. 8 times more than Latvia	25,000 ton Ranked 121st.
Transfers in > Per capita	-0.741 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd.	-126.494 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 171 times more than Denmark
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	4.8 ton Ranked 32nd.	5.65 ton Ranked 30th. 18% more than Denmark
Bunkers	507,000 ton Ranked 30th. 3 times more than Latvia	174,000 ton Ranked 43th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	1,000 ton Ranked 35th.	8,000 ton Ranked 33th. 8 times more than Denmark
Consumption by energy sector	17,000 ton Ranked 60th. 17 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 70th.
Consumption by households > Per capita	0.185 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th.	15.9 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 86 times more than Denmark
Consumption by households	1,000 ton Ranked 15th.	40,000 ton Ranked 6th. 40 times more than Denmark
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	3.14 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 47th. 7 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 66th.
Consumption by other consumers	3,000 ton Ranked 65th.	9,000 ton Ranked 50th. 3 times more than Denmark
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.554 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 61st.	3.91 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 31st. 7 times more than Denmark
Bunkers per 1000	93.55 ton Ranked 15th. 24% more than Latvia	75.64 ton Ranked 20th.
Changes in stocks per million	16,606.91 ton Ranked 7th.	-4,346.858 ton Ranked 65th.
Consumption by households per 1000	0.185 ton Ranked 13th.	16.1 ton Ranked 5th. 87 times more than Denmark
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.192 ton Ranked 33th.	3.29 ton Ranked 20th. 17 times more than Denmark
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	24.73 ton Ranked 52nd. 5 times more than Latvia	5.22 ton Ranked 82nd.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	1.85 ton Ranked 16th.	16.52 ton Ranked 6th. 9 times more than Denmark
Imports per 1000	221.43 ton Ranked 23th. 2 times more than Latvia	106.06 ton Ranked 32nd.
Net transfers per 1000	-0.74 ton Ranked 12th.	-126.494 ton Ranked 21st. 171 times more than Denmark
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	2.77 ton Ranked 24th. 2 times more than Latvia	1.29 ton Ranked 34th.
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	3.14 ton Ranked 45th. 7 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton Ranked 64th.
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	57.57 ton Ranked 43th. 9 times more than Latvia	6.09 ton Ranked 92nd.
Net inland availability per 1000	38.56 ton Ranked 50th. 4 times more than Latvia	10.87 ton Ranked 88th.
Transfers in per million	-740.121 ton Ranked 2nd.	-126,493.581 ton Ranked 12th. 171 times more than Denmark
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	27.49 ton Ranked 52nd. 5 times more than Latvia	5.22 ton Ranked 86th.
Consumption in agriculture per 1000	4.06 ton Ranked 9th. 2 times more than Latvia	1.74 ton Ranked 18th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	59.42 ton Ranked 47th. 3 times more than Latvia	22.6 ton Ranked 72nd.
Consumption by chemical industry	15,000 ton Ranked 32nd. 5 times more than Latvia	3,000 ton Ranked 40th.
Changes in stocks	90,000 ton Ranked 7th.	-10,000 ton Ranked 48th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	16.62 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th.	-4.347 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 65th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	2.77 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th. 2 times more than Latvia	1.29 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	4.8 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 37th.	5.65 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 35th. 18% more than Denmark
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	27.51 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 55th. 5 times more than Latvia	5.22 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 90th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	134,000 ton Ranked 58th. 11 times more than Latvia	12,000 ton Ranked 109th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.192 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th.	3.27 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 17 times more than Denmark
Transfers in	-4,000 ton Ranked 2nd.	-291,000 ton Ranked 10th. 73 times more than Denmark
Bunkers > Per capita	93.61 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 24% more than Latvia	75.64 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	24.74 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 55th. 5 times more than Latvia	5.22 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 86th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways per 1000	6.27 ton Ranked 15th. 8 times more than Latvia	0.83 ton Ranked 26th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.554 ton Ranked 56th.	3.91 ton Ranked 26th. 7 times more than Denmark
Consumption by transportation industry	34,000 ton Ranked 29th. 17 times more than Latvia	2,000 ton Ranked 47th.
Consumption by transportation industry per 1000	6.27 ton Ranked 18th. 8 times more than Latvia	0.83 ton Ranked 35th.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	59.45 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 51st. 3 times more than Latvia	22.6 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 79th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation