Energy > Residual fuel oil Stats: compare key data on Canada & Poland

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Canada	Poland	HISTORY
Bunkers	531,000 ton Ranked 28th. 3 times more than Poland	212,000 ton Ranked 41st.
Bunkers per 1000	16.43 ton Ranked 41st. 3 times more than Poland	5.55 ton Ranked 54th.
Changes in stocks at producers per 1000	1.6 ton Ranked 17th. 15 times more than Poland	0.104 ton Ranked 29th.
Changes in stocks per million	-2,599.653 ton Ranked 61st.	130.95 ton Ranked 39th.
Consumption by energy sector	708,000 ton Ranked 19th.	712,000 ton Ranked 18th. 1% more than Canada
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	21.92 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st. 17% more than Poland	18.66 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.
Consumption by households	19,000 ton Ranked 8th.	68,000 ton Ranked 6th. 4 times more than Canada
Consumption by households > Per capita	0.588 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th.	1.78 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 3 times more than Canada
Consumption by households and other consumers	1.35 million ton Ranked 4th. 7 times more than Poland	183,000 ton Ranked 24th.
Consumption by industry and construction	2.16 million ton Ranked 15th. 5 times more than Poland	402,000 ton Ranked 43th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	154,000 ton Ranked 15th. 10 times more than Poland	16,000 ton Ranked 25th.
Consumption by other consumers	1.27 million ton Ranked 3rd. 51 times more than Poland	25,000 ton Ranked 38th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	39.35 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 60 times more than Poland	0.655 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 58th.
Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	21.92 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 19th. 19% more than Poland	18.47 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	95.02 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 42nd. 6 times more than Poland	14.7 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 85th.
Consumption by households per 1000	0.588 ton Ranked 11th.	1.78 ton Ranked 12th. 3 times more than Canada
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	4.77 ton Ranked 10th. 11 times more than Poland	0.418 ton Ranked 28th.
Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	21.91 ton Ranked 18th. 19% more than Poland	18.47 ton Ranked 19th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	60.13 ton Ranked 21st. 8 times more than Poland	7.97 ton Ranked 74th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	7.7 ton Ranked 17th. 11 times more than Poland	0.707 ton Ranked 23th.
Imports per 1000	80.81 ton Ranked 36th. 237 times more than Poland	0.341 ton Ranked 126th.
Net transfers per 1000	-30.546 ton Ranked 18th.	4.87 ton Ranked 10th.
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	1.98 ton Ranked 29th.	2.57 ton Ranked 25th. 30% more than Canada
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	21.91 ton Ranked 20th. 17% more than Poland	18.66 ton Ranked 22nd.
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	94.98 ton Ranked 32nd. 7 times more than Poland	13.99 ton Ranked 76th.
Transfers out per 1000	0.0687 ton Ranked 10th.	4.87 ton Ranked 10th. 71 times more than Canada
Net inland availability per 1000	140.07 ton Ranked 13th. 9 times more than Poland	15.33 ton Ranked 78th.
Consumption in agriculture per 1000	2.01 ton Ranked 17th.	4.79 ton Ranked 8th. 2 times more than Canada
Changes in stocks at producers	46,000 ton Ranked 18th. 12 times more than Poland	4,000 ton Ranked 29th.
Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	1.59 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th. 15 times more than Poland	0.104 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th.
Consumption by chemical industry	64,000 ton Ranked 23th.	98,000 ton Ranked 20th. 53% more than Canada
Changes in stocks	-84,000 ton Ranked 65th.	5,000 ton Ranked 37th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-2.601 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 61st.	0.131 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 40th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	1.98 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th.	2.57 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th. 30% more than Canada
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	41.95 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 9 times more than Poland	4.79 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 38th.
Consumption in agriculture	65,000 ton Ranked 10th.	183,000 ton Ranked 6th. 3 times more than Canada
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways	1.01 million ton Ranked 4th. 1010 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 35th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways > Per capita	31.27 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 1203 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 35th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	231,000 ton Ranked 10th. 9 times more than Poland	27,000 ton Ranked 19th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	7.7 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 17th. 11 times more than Poland	0.707 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 23th.
Conversion in thermal power plants	3.07 million ton Ranked 16th. 6 times more than Poland	534,000 ton Ranked 51st.
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	95.02 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 38th. 7 times more than Poland	13.99 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 83th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	3.07 million ton Ranked 17th. 5 times more than Poland	561,000 ton Ranked 51st.
Imports > Per capita	80.84 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 42nd. 237 times more than Poland	0.341 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 136th.
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	2.01 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 17th.	4.79 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 2 times more than Canada
Imports	2.61 million ton Ranked 12th. 201 times more than Poland	13,000 ton Ranked 123th.
Net transfers	-987,000 ton Ranked 21st.	188,000 ton Ranked 9th.
Net transfers > Per capita	-30.558 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 19th.	4.87 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	140.13 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th. 9 times more than Poland	15.33 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 85th.
Transfers out	2,000 ton Ranked 12th.	188,000 ton Ranked 9th. 94 times more than Canada
Bunkers > Per capita	16.44 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 46th. 3 times more than Poland	5.55 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 59th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	60.16 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 23th. 8 times more than Poland	7.96 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 78th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways per 1000	31.26 ton Ranked 3rd. 1207 times more than Poland	0.0259 ton Ranked 35th.
Net inland availability	4.53 million ton Ranked 11th. 8 times more than Poland	585,000 ton Ranked 40th.
Transfers out > Per capita	0.069 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th.	4.87 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 71 times more than Canada
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	39.34 ton Ranked 4th. 60 times more than Poland	0.655 ton Ranked 52nd.
Consumption by transportation industry	1.01 million ton Ranked 5th. 63 times more than Poland	16,000 ton Ranked 32nd.
Consumption by transportation industry per 1000	31.26 ton Ranked 4th. 75 times more than Poland	0.414 ton Ranked 39th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	94.98 ton Ranked 36th. 6 times more than Poland	14.7 ton Ranked 78th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	66.91 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 19th. 6 times more than Poland	10.53 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 79th.
Consumption by petroleum refineries	708,000 ton Ranked 14th. About the same as Poland	705,000 ton Ranked 15th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	1.94 million ton Ranked 14th. 6 times more than Poland	304,000 ton Ranked 48th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	4.77 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 11 times more than Poland	0.418 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th.
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	31.27 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 76 times more than Poland	0.414 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	41.93 ton Ranked 6th. 9 times more than Poland	4.79 ton Ranked 33th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	66.88 ton Ranked 16th. 6 times more than Poland	10.53 ton Ranked 75th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation