Energy > Residual fuel oil Stats: compare key data on Norway & Poland

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Norway	Poland	HISTORY
Bunkers	294,000 ton Ranked 35th. 39% more than Poland	212,000 ton Ranked 41st.
Consumption by energy sector	2,000 ton Ranked 71st.	712,000 ton Ranked 18th. 356 times more than Norway
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.436 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 68th.	18.66 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th. 43 times more than Norway
Consumption by households	1,000 ton Ranked 27th.	68,000 ton Ranked 6th. 68 times more than Norway
Consumption by households > Per capita	0.232 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th.	1.78 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 8 times more than Norway
Consumption by households and other consumers	6,000 ton Ranked 77th.	183,000 ton Ranked 24th. 31 times more than Norway
Consumption by industry and construction	219,000 ton Ranked 55th.	402,000 ton Ranked 43th. 84% more than Norway
Consumption by iron and steel industry	3,000 ton Ranked 35th.	16,000 ton Ranked 25th. 5 times more than Norway
Consumption by other consumers	1,000 ton Ranked 76th.	25,000 ton Ranked 38th. 25 times more than Norway
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.216 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 70th.	0.655 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 58th. 3 times more than Norway
Consumption by other energy producers > Per capita	0.226 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 9 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th.
Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	0.665 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 62nd.	18.47 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd. 28 times more than Norway
Consumption for non-energy uses	3,000 ton Ranked 7th.	21,000 ton Ranked 5th. 7 times more than Norway
Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	0.673 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 24% more than Poland	0.544 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	0.216 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 126th.	14.7 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 85th. 68 times more than Norway
Consumption by other energy producers	1,000 ton Ranked 9th. The same as Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 6th.
Bunkers per 1000	63.59 ton Ranked 22nd. 11 times more than Poland	5.55 ton Ranked 54th.
Changes in stocks at producers per 1000	-6.03 ton Ranked 44th.	0.104 ton Ranked 29th.
Changes in stocks per million	9,300.73 ton Ranked 13th. 71 times more than Poland	130.95 ton Ranked 39th.
Consumption by households per 1000	0.232 ton Ranked 26th.	1.78 ton Ranked 12th. 8 times more than Norway
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.677 ton Ranked 29th. 62% more than Poland	0.418 ton Ranked 28th.
Consumption by other energy producers per 1000	0.226 ton Ranked 8th. 9 times more than Poland	0.0262 ton Ranked 6th.
Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	0.665 ton Ranked 62nd.	18.47 ton Ranked 19th. 28 times more than Norway
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	35.69 ton Ranked 32nd. 4 times more than Poland	7.97 ton Ranked 74th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.216 ton Ranked 25th.	0.707 ton Ranked 23th. 3 times more than Norway
Imports per 1000	368.78 ton Ranked 16th. 1083 times more than Poland	0.341 ton Ranked 126th.
Net transfers per 1000	293.08 ton Ranked 1st. 60 times more than Poland	4.87 ton Ranked 10th.
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	11.68 ton Ranked 10th. 5 times more than Poland	2.57 ton Ranked 25th.
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.436 ton Ranked 66th.	18.66 ton Ranked 22nd. 43 times more than Norway
Consumption in rail transport per million	220.35 ton Ranked 5th. 70% more than Poland	129.45 ton Ranked 7th.
Transfers out per 1000	293.08 ton Ranked 1st. 60 times more than Poland	4.87 ton Ranked 10th.
Net inland availability per 1000	58.83 ton Ranked 35th. 4 times more than Poland	15.33 ton Ranked 78th.
Consumption in agriculture per 1000	1.08 ton Ranked 23th.	4.79 ton Ranked 8th. 4 times more than Norway
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	0.216 ton Ranked 119th.	14.7 ton Ranked 78th. 68 times more than Norway
Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	-6.03 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 45th.	0.104 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th.
Consumption by chemical industry	54,000 ton Ranked 26th.	98,000 ton Ranked 20th. 81% more than Norway
Changes in stocks	43,000 ton Ranked 17th. 9 times more than Poland	5,000 ton Ranked 37th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	9.3 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 71 times more than Poland	0.131 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 40th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	11.68 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 5 times more than Poland	2.57 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	1.3 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 65th.	4.79 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 38th. 4 times more than Norway
Consumption in agriculture	5,000 ton Ranked 32nd.	183,000 ton Ranked 6th. 37 times more than Norway
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways	47,000 ton Ranked 21st. 47 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 35th.
Consumption in rail transport > Per capita	0.22 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 71% more than Poland	0.129 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways > Per capita	10.17 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 391 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 35th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	1,000 ton Ranked 27th.	27,000 ton Ranked 19th. 27 times more than Norway
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.216 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.	0.707 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 23th. 3 times more than Norway
Conversion to other forms of energy	1,000 ton Ranked 130th.	561,000 ton Ranked 51st. 561 times more than Norway
Imports > Per capita	368.78 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st. 1081 times more than Poland	0.341 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 136th.
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	1.08 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th.	4.79 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 4 times more than Norway
Imports	1.71 million ton Ranked 18th. 131 times more than Poland	13,000 ton Ranked 123th.
Net transfers	1.35 million ton Ranked 2nd. 7 times more than Poland	188,000 ton Ranked 9th.
Net transfers > Per capita	293.08 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 60 times more than Poland	4.87 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	58.83 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 40th. 4 times more than Poland	15.33 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 85th.
Transfers out	1.35 million ton Ranked 2nd. 7 times more than Poland	188,000 ton Ranked 9th.
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	10.17 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 25 times more than Poland	0.414 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.
Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	0.672 ton Ranked 7th. 24% more than Poland	0.544 ton Ranked 5th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways per 1000	10.17 ton Ranked 8th. 393 times more than Poland	0.0259 ton Ranked 35th.
Net inland availability	272,000 ton Ranked 56th.	585,000 ton Ranked 40th. 2 times more than Norway
Transfers out > Per capita	293.08 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 60 times more than Poland	4.87 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.216 ton Ranked 65th.	0.655 ton Ranked 52nd. 3 times more than Norway
Consumption by transportation industry	47,000 ton Ranked 26th. 3 times more than Poland	16,000 ton Ranked 32nd.
Consumption by transportation industry per 1000	10.17 ton Ranked 11th. 25 times more than Poland	0.414 ton Ranked 39th.
Changes in stocks at producers	-26,000 ton Ranked 41st.	4,000 ton Ranked 29th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	47.37 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th. 4 times more than Poland	10.53 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 79th.
Consumption by petroleum refineries	3,000 ton Ranked 64th.	705,000 ton Ranked 15th. 235 times more than Norway
Consumption by other industries and construction	165,000 ton Ranked 56th.	304,000 ton Ranked 48th. 84% more than Norway
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.677 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 29th. 62% more than Poland	0.418 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th.
Consumption in rail transport	1,000 ton Ranked 11th.	5,000 ton Ranked 6th. 5 times more than Norway
Bunkers > Per capita	63.59 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th. 11 times more than Poland	5.55 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 59th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	35.69 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th. 4 times more than Poland	7.96 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 78th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	1.3 ton Ranked 60th.	4.79 ton Ranked 33th. 4 times more than Norway
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	47.37 ton Ranked 28th. 4 times more than Poland	10.53 ton Ranked 75th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation