Energy > Gas-diesel oils Stats: compare key data on Japan & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Japan	Latvia	HISTORY
Consumption by households and other consumers	15.85 million ton Ranked 4th. 163 times more than Latvia	97,000 ton Ranked 87th.
Consumption by industry and construction	10.46 million ton Ranked 3rd. 317 times more than Latvia	33,000 ton Ranked 102nd.
Consumption by transportation industry	27.9 million ton Ranked 3rd. 51 times more than Latvia	542,000 ton Ranked 81st.
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	218.32 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 46th.	235.6 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 42nd. 8% more than Japan
Consumption in agriculture	3.68 million ton Ranked 5th. 90 times more than Latvia	41,000 ton Ranked 72nd.
Consumption in agriculture per 1000	28.79 ton Ranked 35th. 62% more than Latvia	17.82 ton Ranked 49th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways	1.28 million ton Ranked 4th. 92 times more than Latvia	14,000 ton Ranked 40th.
Consumption in rail transport	211,000 ton Ranked 18th. 3 times more than Latvia	82,000 ton Ranked 25th.
Consumption in rail transport per 1000	1.65 ton Ranked 44th.	35.64 ton Ranked 3rd. 22 times more than Japan
Consumption in road transport	26.4 million ton Ranked 4th. 57 times more than Latvia	460,000 ton Ranked 86th.
Consumption in road transport > Per capita	206.65 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 44th. 3% more than Latvia	199.96 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 47th.
Consumption in road transport per 1000	206.65 ton Ranked 38th. 3% more than Latvia	199.96 ton Ranked 40th.
Conversion in thermal power plants	867,000 ton Ranked 11th. 867 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 149th.
Imports	698,000 ton Ranked 57th.	900,000 ton Ranked 44th. 29% more than Japan
Statistical differences > Per capita	-5,173,196,424,937.78 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 70th. 2 times more than Latvia	-2,173,440,556,400.78 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 66th.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	6.79 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 84th. 16 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 146th.
Energy balance requirement	-3,280,000 ton Ranked 192nd.	665,000 ton Ranked 40th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	-25.669 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 174th.	289.07 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 45th.
Net inland availability	54.2 million ton Ranked 3rd. 81 times more than Latvia	672,000 ton Ranked 92nd.
Transfers in	-59,000 ton Ranked 6th. 7 times more than Latvia	-8,000 ton Ranked 4th.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	-25.671 ton Ranked 158th.	289.07 ton Ranked 31st.
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	1.34 ton Ranked 18th. 3 times more than Latvia	0.397 ton Ranked 25th.
Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries > Per capita	0.274 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th.	2.17 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 8 times more than Japan
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	124.02 ton Ranked 21st. 3 times more than Latvia	42.16 ton Ranked 54th.
Consumption by transportation industry per 1000	218.32 ton Ranked 39th.	235.6 ton Ranked 35th. 8% more than Japan
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways per 1000	10.03 ton Ranked 15th. 67% more than Latvia	5.99 ton Ranked 24th.
Net transfers > Per capita	-0.461 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 14th.	-3.477 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 15th. 8 times more than Japan
Changes in stocks > Per capita	3.15 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th.	12.61 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd. 4 times more than Japan
Consumption in rail transport > Per capita	1.65 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 44th.	35.64 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 22 times more than Japan
Conversion to other forms of energy	867,000 ton Ranked 11th. 867 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 154th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	3.09 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th. 7 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st.
Imports per 1000	5.46 ton Ranked 158th.	391.22 ton Ranked 30th. 72 times more than Japan
Transfers in per million	-461.756 ton Ranked 5th.	-3,477.487 ton Ranked 6th. 8 times more than Japan
Bunkers	184,000 ton Ranked 24th. 2 times more than Latvia	90,000 ton Ranked 39th.
Consumption by energy sector	50,000 ton Ranked 18th. 10 times more than Latvia	5,000 ton Ranked 39th.
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.391 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 38th.	2.17 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th. 6 times more than Japan
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	81.89 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th. 6 times more than Latvia	14.35 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 68th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	9.9 million ton Ranked 3rd. 309 times more than Latvia	32,000 ton Ranked 101st.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways > Per capita	10.03 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 15th. 67% more than Latvia	5.99 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th.
Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries	35,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 7 times more than Latvia	5,000 ton Ranked 8th.
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	28.79 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 38th. 62% more than Latvia	17.82 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 51st.
Net transfers per 1000	-0.462 ton Ranked 13th.	-3.477 ton Ranked 14th. 8 times more than Japan
Bunkers per 1000	1.44 ton Ranked 62nd.	39.12 ton Ranked 19th. 27 times more than Japan
Consumption by other consumers	12.17 million ton Ranked 3rd. 406 times more than Latvia	30,000 ton Ranked 77th.
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	6.79 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 81st. 16 times more than Latvia	0.422 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 129th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	77.46 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 17th. 6 times more than Latvia	13.91 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 67th.
Exports per 1000	26.55 ton Ranked 46th.	50.42 ton Ranked 40th. 90% more than Japan
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	77.46 ton Ranked 17th. 6 times more than Latvia	13.91 ton Ranked 66th.
Net inland availability per 1000	424.23 ton Ranked 30th. 45% more than Latvia	292.11 ton Ranked 45th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	425.91 ton Ranked 40th. 47% more than Latvia	289.07 ton Ranked 66th.
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.391 ton Ranked 36th.	2.17 ton Ranked 17th. 6 times more than Japan
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	81.89 ton Ranked 15th. 6 times more than Latvia	14.34 ton Ranked 67th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	95.23 ton Ranked 13th. 7 times more than Latvia	13.04 ton Ranked 48th.
Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries per 1000	0.274 ton Ranked 9th.	2.17 ton Ranked 3rd. 8 times more than Japan
Exports	3.39 million ton Ranked 18th. 29 times more than Latvia	116,000 ton Ranked 64th.
Gross inland availability	54.42 million ton Ranked 3rd. 82 times more than Latvia	665,000 ton Ranked 95th.
Imports > Per capita	5.46 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 176th.	391.22 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 40th. 72 times more than Japan
Transfers in > Per capita	-0.461 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th.	-3.477 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th. 8 times more than Japan
Net inland availability > Per capita	424.23 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 38th. 45% more than Latvia	292.11 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 53th.
Changes in stocks	402,000 ton Ranked 6th. 14 times more than Latvia	29,000 ton Ranked 36th.
Consumption by chemical industry	171,000 ton Ranked 6th. 171 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 30th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	1.34 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th. 3 times more than Latvia	0.392 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	395,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 395 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 37th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	95.23 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 14th. 7 times more than Latvia	13.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 51st.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	124.02 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Latvia	42.16 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 56th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	6.79 ton Ranked 72nd. 16 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton Ranked 132nd.
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	6.79 ton Ranked 69th. 16 times more than Latvia	0.421 ton Ranked 131st.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	425.91 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 51st. 47% more than Latvia	289.07 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 81st.
Net transfers	-59,000 ton Ranked 15th. 7 times more than Latvia	-8,000 ton Ranked 13th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	3.09 ton Ranked 6th. 7 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton Ranked 21st.
Changes in stocks per 1000	3.15 ton Ranked 34th.	12.61 ton Ranked 22nd. 4 times more than Japan
Exports > Per capita	26.55 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 49th.	50.42 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 43th. 90% more than Japan

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation