Energy > Gas-diesel oils Stats: compare key data on Denmark & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Denmark	Latvia	HISTORY
Consumption by households	559,000 ton Ranked 13th. 22 times more than Latvia	26,000 ton Ranked 35th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	1.12 million ton Ranked 30th. 12 times more than Latvia	97,000 ton Ranked 87th.
Consumption by industry and construction	383,000 ton Ranked 42nd. 12 times more than Latvia	33,000 ton Ranked 102nd.
Consumption by transportation industry	2.28 million ton Ranked 43th. 4 times more than Latvia	542,000 ton Ranked 81st.
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	420.42 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd. 78% more than Latvia	235.6 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 42nd.
Consumption in agriculture	473,000 ton Ranked 31st. 12 times more than Latvia	41,000 ton Ranked 72nd.
Consumption in agriculture per 1000	87.28 ton Ranked 5th. 5 times more than Latvia	17.82 ton Ranked 49th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways	102,000 ton Ranked 27th. 7 times more than Latvia	14,000 ton Ranked 40th.
Consumption in rail transport	73,000 ton Ranked 28th.	82,000 ton Ranked 25th. 12% more than Denmark
Consumption in rail transport per 1000	13.47 ton Ranked 11th.	35.64 ton Ranked 3rd. 3 times more than Denmark
Consumption in road transport	2.07 million ton Ranked 44th. 5 times more than Latvia	460,000 ton Ranked 86th.
Consumption in road transport > Per capita	382.57 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th. 91% more than Latvia	199.96 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 47th.
Consumption in road transport per 1000	382.33 ton Ranked 16th. 91% more than Latvia	199.96 ton Ranked 40th.
Conversion in thermal power plants	10,000 ton Ranked 116th. 10 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 149th.
Imports	2.1 million ton Ranked 21st. 2 times more than Latvia	900,000 ton Ranked 44th.
Consumption by energy sector	1,000 ton Ranked 47th.	5,000 ton Ranked 39th. 5 times more than Denmark
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.19 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 46th.	2.17 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th. 11 times more than Denmark
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	70.72 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd. 5 times more than Latvia	14.35 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 68th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	370,000 ton Ranked 39th. 12 times more than Latvia	32,000 ton Ranked 101st.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways > Per capita	18.83 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Latvia	5.99 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th.
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	87.33 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th. 5 times more than Latvia	17.82 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 51st.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	3.32 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 8 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th.
Net transfers per 1000	2.41 ton Ranked 7th.	-3.477 ton Ranked 14th.
Bunkers per 1000	60.15 ton Ranked 13th. 54% more than Latvia	39.12 ton Ranked 19th.
Consumption by other consumers	88,000 ton Ranked 56th. 3 times more than Latvia	30,000 ton Ranked 77th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	18,000 ton Ranked 8th. 18 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 20th.
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	1.85 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 119th. 4 times more than Latvia	0.422 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 129th.
Consumption by households > Per capita	103,213.12 ton per million people Ranked 11th. 9 times more than Latvia	11,301.89 ton per million people Ranked 28th.
Net inland availability per 1000	697.49 ton Ranked 17th. 2 times more than Latvia	292.11 ton Ranked 45th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	690.11 ton Ranked 20th. 2 times more than Latvia	289.07 ton Ranked 66th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	70.67 ton Ranked 20th. 5 times more than Latvia	14.34 ton Ranked 67th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	16.24 ton Ranked 44th. 25% more than Latvia	13.04 ton Ranked 48th.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	95.21 ton Ranked 59th.	289.07 ton Ranked 31st. 3 times more than Denmark
Changes in stocks per 1000	54.62 ton Ranked 2nd. 4 times more than Latvia	12.61 ton Ranked 22nd.
Exports > Per capita	178.55 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd. 4 times more than Latvia	50.42 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 43th.
Imports per 1000	388.42 ton Ranked 31st.	391.22 ton Ranked 30th. 1% more than Denmark
Transfers in per million	-5,073.472 ton Ranked 3rd. 46% more than Latvia	-3,477.487 ton Ranked 6th.
Bunkers	326,000 ton Ranked 17th. 4 times more than Latvia	90,000 ton Ranked 39th.
Gross inland availability	3.74 million ton Ranked 46th. 6 times more than Latvia	665,000 ton Ranked 95th.
Imports > Per capita	388.67 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 41st.	391.22 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 40th. 1% more than Denmark
Transfers in > Per capita	-5.075 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 46% more than Latvia	-3.477 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	697.93 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd. 2 times more than Latvia	292.11 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 53th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-12,555,442,433,481.1 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 82nd. 6 times more than Latvia	-2,173,440,556,400.78 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 66th.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	5.17 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 91st. 12 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 146th.
Energy balance requirement	516,000 ton Ranked 48th.	665,000 ton Ranked 40th. 29% more than Denmark
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	95.27 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 74th.	289.07 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 45th. 3 times more than Denmark
Net inland availability	3.78 million ton Ranked 43th. 6 times more than Latvia	672,000 ton Ranked 92nd.
Transfers in	-27,000 ton Ranked 1st. 3 times more than Latvia	-8,000 ton Ranked 4th.
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	1.66 ton Ranked 16th. 4 times more than Latvia	0.397 ton Ranked 25th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	206.66 ton Ranked 14th. 5 times more than Latvia	42.16 ton Ranked 54th.
Consumption by households per 1000	103.15 ton Ranked 9th. 9 times more than Latvia	11.3 ton Ranked 27th.
Consumption by transportation industry per 1000	420.15 ton Ranked 14th. 78% more than Latvia	235.6 ton Ranked 35th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways per 1000	18.82 ton Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Latvia	5.99 ton Ranked 24th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	3.32 ton Ranked 5th. 8 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton Ranked 16th.
Net transfers > Per capita	2.41 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th.	-3.477 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 15th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	54.65 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd. 4 times more than Latvia	12.61 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd.
Consumption in rail transport > Per capita	13.48 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th.	35.64 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 3 times more than Denmark
Conversion to other forms of energy	28,000 ton Ranked 96th. 28 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 154th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.739 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 17th. 70% more than Latvia	0.435 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 21st.
Changes in stocks	296,000 ton Ranked 8th. 10 times more than Latvia	29,000 ton Ranked 36th.
Consumption by chemical industry	9,000 ton Ranked 28th. 9 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 30th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	1.66 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th. 4 times more than Latvia	0.392 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	4,000 ton Ranked 27th. 4 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 37th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	16.25 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 47th. 25% more than Latvia	13.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 51st.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	206.8 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 16th. 5 times more than Latvia	42.16 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 56th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	5.17 ton Ranked 77th. 12 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton Ranked 132nd.
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	1.85 ton Ranked 106th. 4 times more than Latvia	0.421 ton Ranked 131st.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	690.55 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 29th. 2 times more than Latvia	289.07 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 81st.
Net transfers	13,000 ton Ranked 9th.	-8,000 ton Ranked 13th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	68.32 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th. 5 times more than Latvia	13.91 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 67th.
Exports per 1000	178.43 ton Ranked 20th. 4 times more than Latvia	50.42 ton Ranked 40th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	68.27 ton Ranked 22nd. 5 times more than Latvia	13.91 ton Ranked 66th.
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.19 ton Ranked 46th.	2.17 ton Ranked 17th. 11 times more than Denmark
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.738 ton Ranked 17th. 70% more than Latvia	0.435 ton Ranked 21st.
Exports	967,000 ton Ranked 37th. 8 times more than Latvia	116,000 ton Ranked 64th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation